Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Good‐turing frequency estimation without tears*

Open access
Gale, William A., Sampson, Geoffrey·1995·Journal of Quantitative Linguistics

Abstract

Linguists and speech researchers who use statistical methods often need to estimate the frequency of some type of item in a population containing items of various types. A common approach is to divide the number of cases observed in a sample by the size of the sample; sometimes small positive quantities are added to divisor and dividend in order to avoid zero estimates for types missing from the sample. These approaches are obvious and simple, but they lack principled justification, and yield estimates that can be wildly inaccurate. I.J. Good and Alan Turing developed a family of theoretically well‐founded techniques appropriate to this domain. Some versions of the Good‐Turing approach are very demanding computationally, but we define a version, the Simple Good‐Turing estimator, which is straightforward to use. Tested on a variety of natural‐language‐related data sets, the Simple Good‐Turing estimator performs well, absolutely and relative both to the approaches just discussed and to other, more sophisticated techniques.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09296179508590051

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Gale, W. A., & Sampson, G.
Venue
Journal of Quantitative Linguistics
Published
1995-01
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
217-237
ISSN
  • 0929-6174 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5035
OpenAlex
W2063918473
Cited by
314
References
0
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Good‐turing frequency estimation without tears*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09296179508590051
The paper
Gale, W. A., & Sampson, G. (1995). Good‐turing frequency estimation without tears*. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296179508590051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.