The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Good‐turing frequency estimation without tears*
Open accessAbstract
Linguists and speech researchers who use statistical methods often need to estimate the frequency of some type of item in a population containing items of various types. A common approach is to divide the number of cases observed in a sample by the size of the sample; sometimes small positive quantities are added to divisor and dividend in order to avoid zero estimates for types missing from the sample. These approaches are obvious and simple, but they lack principled justification, and yield estimates that can be wildly inaccurate. I.J. Good and Alan Turing developed a family of theoretically well‐founded techniques appropriate to this domain. Some versions of the Good‐Turing approach are very demanding computationally, but we define a version, the Simple Good‐Turing estimator, which is straightforward to use. Tested on a variety of natural‐language‐related data sets, the Simple Good‐Turing estimator performs well, absolutely and relative both to the approaches just discussed and to other, more sophisticated techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts
Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W., & Smyth, G. K. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r29 · Cited by 6,155
BLOG: Probabilistic Models with Unknown Objects
Milch, B., Marthi, B., Russell, S., Sontag, D., Ong, D. L., & Kolobov, A. (2007) · Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7432.003.0015 · Cited by 390
Acoustic sequences in non‐human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus
Kershenbaum, A., Blumstein, D. T., Roch, M. A., Akçay, Ç., Backus, G., Bee, M. A., Bohn, K., Cao, Y., Carter, G., Cäsar, C., et al. (2016) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12160 · Cited by 337
(1998) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 293
(2007) · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Gale, W. A., & Sampson, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Quantitative Linguistics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-237
- ISSN
- 0929-6174 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5035
- OpenAlex
- W2063918473
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Good‐turing frequency estimation without tears*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09296179508590051
- The paper
- Gale, W. A., & Sampson, G. (1995). Good‐turing frequency estimation without tears*. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296179508590051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.