Factors of biological risk and reserve associated with executive behaviors in children and adolescents with spina bifida myelomeningocele
Abstract
This study examined differences between healthy children (n = 35) and those with spina bifida myelomeningocele (SBM; n = 42) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), a measure of executive function behaviors. It also examined whether aspects of biological risk associated with SBM and reserve factors within the family could account for variability in BRIEF scores for children and adolescents with SBM. Patients in the SBM group exhibited more problems than both published norms and a local comparison group of healthy children in metacognition but not behavior regulation. Behavior regulation problems in children with SBM were predicted by parent psychological distress. More shunt-related surgeries and history of seizures predicted poorer metacognitive abilities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of examining the BRIEF at the level of index/factor scores or individual scales in pediatric and adult populations.
“Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated the importance of examining the BRIEF at the level of the indexes/factor scores or at the level of individuals scales in a variety of pediatric (Brown et al., 2008;Mahone et al., 2002) and adult (Christ et al., 2010;Kumbhani et al., 2010;Schroeder & Kelley, 2008) populations.”
From Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult Version in Healthy Adults and Application to Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (2013) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2008
Cites
Mangeot, S., Armstrong, K., Colvin, A. N., Yeates, K. O., & Taylor, H. G. (2002) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1076/chin.8.4.271.13503 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12001 · Cited by 1,381 · see citing works
MCAULEY, T., CHEN, S., GOOS, L., SCHACHAR, R., & CROSBIE, J. (2010) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617710000093 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Contribution of Rating Scales to the Assessment of Executive Functions
Isquith, P. K., Roth, R. M., & Gioia, G. (2013) · Applied Neuropsychology: Child · doi:10.1080/21622965.2013.748389 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Nyongesa, M. K., Ssewanyana, D., Mutua, A. M., Chongwo, E., Scerif, G., Newton, C. R. J. C., & Abubakar, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00311 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
McAuley, T., Crosbie, J., Charach, A., & Schachar, R. (2017) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-016-0189-x · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Smith, Z. R., Del Castillo, A., Clark, O. E., & Holmbeck, G. N. (2022) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2022.2042503 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Brown, T. M., Ris, M. D., Beebe, D., Ammerman, R. T., Oppenheimer, S. G., Yeates, K. O., & Enrile, B. G.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Tanya Maines
- Venue
- Child Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-02-28
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 118-134
- ISSN
- 0929-7049 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-4136
- OpenAlex
- W2015572261
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR008084, M01-RR-08084)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
- Keywords
- executive function, metacognition, behavioral regulation, biological risk factors, reserve factor, seizures, children and adolescents, Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Brain, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Meningomyelocele, Neuropsychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Spinal Dysraphism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review