Improving executive functioning in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders
Abstract
An extensive body of literature has documented executive function (EF) impairments in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD); however, few studies have aimed specifically at improving EF. One treatment program that shows promise for children with FASD is the Alert Program for Self-Regulation®, which is a 12-week treatment specifically designed to target self-regulation, a component of EF. The present study sought to examine if Alert would produce improvements in self-regulation that would generalize to other aspects of EF, behavior, and social skills in children with FASD. Twenty-five children aged 8-12 years diagnosed with an FASD were assigned in alternating sequence to either an immediate treatment (TXT) or a delayed treatment control (DTC) group. Both groups received a comprehensive evaluation of EF at baseline and upon completing therapy (TXT), or after a 12- to 14-week interval from baseline (DTC). Parents also completed questionnaires assessing EF and behavior at both time points. For the TXT group only, parent questionnaires were readministered at 6-month follow-up. At the 12-week follow-up, the TXT group displayed significant improvements in inhibitory control and social cognition. Parents of children in the TXT group reported improved behavioral and emotional regulation, as well as reduced externalizing behavior problems. These behavioral improvements along with further improved parent-rated inhibitory control was maintained at the 6-month follow-up. The EF disabilities in children with FASD can be remediated through a targeted treatment approach aimed at facilitating self-regulation skills.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies of this nature showed a medium effect size.
“Previous studies of this nature showed a medium effect size [42-45]; however, owing to the differences in method and there not being interventionists involved in the training sample, size calculations were done for a small (d=0.2) effect size.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 113
- Authors
- Nash, K., Stevens, S., Greenbaum, R., Weiner, J., Koren, G., & Rovet, J.
- Affiliations
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Surrey Place Centre (CA)
- ,
- Corresponding author
- Nash, Kelly
- Venue
- Child Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-209
- ISSN
- 0929-7049 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-4136
- OpenAlex
- W1989172053
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Keywords
- fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, executive function, self-regulation, inhibitory control, social cognition, externalizing problems, emotion regulation, behavioral interventions, children
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Parents, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Executive Function, Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review