The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative Inquiry Learning: Models, tools, and challenges
Abstract
Collaborative inquiry learning is one of the most challenging and exciting ventures for today’s schools. It aims at bringing a new and promising culture of teaching and learning into the classroom where students in groups engage in self‐regulated learning activities supported by the teacher. It is expected that this way of learning fosters students’ motivation and interest in science, that they learn to perform steps of inquiry similar to scientists and that they gain knowledge on scientific processes. Starting from general pedagogical reflections and science standards, the article reviews some prominent models of inquiry learning. This comparison results in a set of inquiry processes being the basis for cooperation in the scientific network NetCoIL. Inquiry learning is conceived in several ways with emphasis on different processes. For an illustration of the spectrum, some main conceptions of inquiry and their focuses are described. In the next step, the article describes exemplary computer tools and environments from within and outside the NetCoIL network that were designed to support processes of collaborative inquiry learning. These tools are analysed by describing their functionalities as well as effects on student learning known from the literature. The article closes with challenges for further developments elaborated by the NetCoIL network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 · Cited by 3,594 · cited 2×
“Further difficulties in defining inquiry learning arise from the fact that inquiry learning can be seen in close relation to problem-based (Evenson & Hmelo, 2000), project-based (Blumenfeld et al., 1991), or discovery learning (Gijlers & de Jong, 2005).”
BackgroundScientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains
De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543068002179 · Cited by 1,593
Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: making science accessible to all students
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2 · Cited by 1,394 · cited 5×
“The inquiry cycle by White and Frederiksen ( 1998 ), for example, consists of the iterated activity sequence “question—predict—experiment—model—apply”; this inquiry cycle is embedded in students’ reflective assessment activities.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhen is an illustration worth ten thousand words?
Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.715 · Cited by 1,051 · cited 2×
“Nevertheless, the graphic format deserves particular attention, since it enables simultaneous processing of large amounts of information (Mayer & Gallini, 1990).”
BackgroundConcept mapping: A useful tool for science education
Novak, J. D. (1990) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660271003 · Cited by 1,032
Addressing the challenges of inquiry‐based learning through technology and curriculum design
Edelson, D., Gordin, D., & Pea, R. (1999) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0803&4_3 · Cited by 366
Learning and Instruction with Computer Simulations: Learning Processes Involved
de Jong, T., & Njoo, M. (1992) · Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-77228-3_19 · Cited by 125
Cited by
Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 · Cited by 2,119
What Does Professional Digital Competence Mean in Teacher Education?
Lund, A., Furberg, A., Bakken, J., & Engelien, K. L. (2014) · Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy · doi:10.18261/issn1891-943x-2014-04-04 · Cited by 209
Student-Generated Content: Enhancing learning through sharing multiple-choice questions
Hardy, J., Bates, S. P., Casey, M. M., Galloway, K. W., Galloway, R. K., Kay, A. E., Kirsop, P., & McQueen, H. A. (2014) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.916831 · Cited by 119
Chan, T.-W., Looi, C.-K., Chen, W., Wong, L.-H., Chang, B., Liao, C. C. Y., Cheng, H., Chen, Z.-H., Liu, C.-C., Kong, S.-C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-018-0122-0 · Cited by 73
Developing nursing ethical competences online versus in the traditional classroom
Trobec, I., & Starcic, A. I. (2015) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733014533241 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Ploetzner, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-06-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 349-377
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W2170557017
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 30.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
