Cited by 34Chemistry Education and ResearchScience Education and PedagogyMathematics Education and Programs

Effectiveness of a short, intense bridging course for scaffolding students commencing university-level study of chemistry

Schmid, Siegbert, Youl, David J., George, Adrian V., Read, Justin R.·2012·International Journal of Science Education

Abstract

Bridging courses designed to support students commencing tertiary education are widespread, and some evidence for the value of semester-length courses has been reported; however, little attention has been paid to short-but-intense bridging courses, and empirical evidence of their effectiveness is particularly sparse. The current study followed the academic performance of a cohort of students enrolled in a first-year chemistry unit of study designed for those with little or no background knowledge of chemistry. The aims of this study are two-fold: first to determine the strength of the linkage between prior knowledge in chemistry and performance on the end of semester exam, and secondly, to explore the reasons for any differences observed. In particular, the value of the week-long intensive-mode bridging course offered by the University of Sydney was analysed. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected. The research has shown that participation in the chemistry bridging course is associated with ‘bridging the gap’ in academic performance between students with No Prior Chemistry background and those with a Strong Background. While the content of the bridging course is a significant contributor to academic success, so too is the confidence in their own learning that the course engenders among participants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09500693.2012.663116

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Schmid et al. (2012) controlled for students' self-reported experiences and prior knowledge about the subject taught in the SBP.

    “In contrast, in the study by Schmid et al. (2012), the variable controlled was students' self-reported experiences and prior knowledge about the subject to be taught in the SBP”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmid, S., Youl, D. J., George, A. V., & Read, J. R.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Schmid, Siegbert
Venue
International Journal of Science Education
Published
2012-03-28
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
1211-1234
ISSN
  • 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5289
OpenAlex
W2133293456
Cited by
34
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
Keywords
bridging courses, first-year chemistry, prior chemistry knowledge, academic performance, student self-confidence, transition to college, chemistry education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review