Effectiveness of a short, intense bridging course for scaffolding students commencing university-level study of chemistry
Abstract
Bridging courses designed to support students commencing tertiary education are widespread, and some evidence for the value of semester-length courses has been reported; however, little attention has been paid to short-but-intense bridging courses, and empirical evidence of their effectiveness is particularly sparse. The current study followed the academic performance of a cohort of students enrolled in a first-year chemistry unit of study designed for those with little or no background knowledge of chemistry. The aims of this study are two-fold: first to determine the strength of the linkage between prior knowledge in chemistry and performance on the end of semester exam, and secondly, to explore the reasons for any differences observed. In particular, the value of the week-long intensive-mode bridging course offered by the University of Sydney was analysed. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected. The research has shown that participation in the chemistry bridging course is associated with ‘bridging the gap’ in academic performance between students with No Prior Chemistry background and those with a Strong Background. While the content of the bridging course is a significant contributor to academic success, so too is the confidence in their own learning that the course engenders among participants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Schmid et al. (2012) controlled for students' self-reported experiences and prior knowledge about the subject taught in the SBP.
“In contrast, in the study by Schmid et al. (2012), the variable controlled was students' self-reported experiences and prior knowledge about the subject to be taught in the SBP”
From Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Schmid et al. (2012)
Cites
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666 · see citing works
On the Theory of Scales of Measurement
Stevens, S. S. (1946) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677 · Cited by 4,761 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Ever since Stevens (1946) introduced the formal divisions between nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio data categories, there has been debate surrounding the analysis of near-interval Likert-type scales (Velleman & Wilkinson, 1993).”
BackgroundThe four-phase model of interest development
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 · Cited by 4,702 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methodological Choices When Assessing Summer Bridge Programs in STEM Majors: A Scoping Review
Caballero Díaz, D., Amin, A., Musa, P., & Leung, V. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16020220
- Authors
- Schmid, S., Youl, D. J., George, A. V., & Read, J. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Schmid, Siegbert
- ORCID
- Schmid, Siegbert
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03-28
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1211-1234
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W2133293456
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 10.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Sydney
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
- Keywords
- bridging courses, first-year chemistry, prior chemistry knowledge, academic performance, student self-confidence, transition to college, chemistry education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review