Guiding students towards sensemaking: teacher questions focused on integrating scientific practices with science content
Abstract
Science education reforms articulate a vision of ambitious science teaching where teachers engage students in sensemaking discussions and emphasise the integration of scientific practices with science content. Learning to teach in this way is complex, and there are few examples of sensemaking discussions in schools where textbook lessons and teacher-directed discussions are the norm. The purpose of this study was to characterise the questioning practices of an experienced teacher who taught a curricular unit enhanced with educative features that emphasised students’ engagement in scientific practices integrated with science content. Analyses indicated the teacher asked four types of questions: explication questions, explanation questions, science concept questions, and scientific practice questions, and she used three questioning patterns including: (1) focusing students on scientific practices, which involved a sequence of questions to turn students back to the scientific practice; (2) supporting students in naming observed phenomena, which involved a sequence of questions to help students use scientific language; and (3) guiding students in sensemaking, which involved a sequence of questions to help students learn about scientific practices, describe evidence, and develop explanations. Although many of the discussions in this study were not yet student-centred, they provide an image of a teacher asking specific questions that move students towards reform-oriented instructio…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The progression of questioning in inquiry teaching has been described by other studies.
“The progression of questioning in inquiry teaching has been also described by other studies”
From Young Children's Epistemic Operations and Emergent Argumentation in Inquiry‐Based Discussions: The Role of Teacher Questioning and Collaborative Interactions (2025) · cites this paper as Benedict-Chambers et al. 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Caño, L., & Sanz, J. (2025) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.70010 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Benedict-Chambers, A., Kademian, S. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S.
- Affiliations
- College of Education, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, USA
- University of Michigan (US)
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-08-29
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1977-2001
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W2753337746
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 10.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
- BearWorks (Missouri State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1007753)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Keywords
- teacher questioning, sensemaking, scientific practice, student-centred instruction, science education reform, classroom discourse, scientific language
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review