Cited by 68Science Education and PedagogyEvolution and Science EducationMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

Guiding students towards sensemaking: teacher questions focused on integrating scientific practices with science content

Benedict-Chambers, Amanda, Kademian, Sylvie M., Davis, Elizabeth A., Palincsar, Annemarie Sullivan·2017·International Journal of Science Education

Abstract

Science education reforms articulate a vision of ambitious science teaching where teachers engage students in sensemaking discussions and emphasise the integration of scientific practices with science content. Learning to teach in this way is complex, and there are few examples of sensemaking discussions in schools where textbook lessons and teacher-directed discussions are the norm. The purpose of this study was to characterise the questioning practices of an experienced teacher who taught a curricular unit enhanced with educative features that emphasised students’ engagement in scientific practices integrated with science content. Analyses indicated the teacher asked four types of questions: explication questions, explanation questions, science concept questions, and scientific practice questions, and she used three questioning patterns including: (1) focusing students on scientific practices, which involved a sequence of questions to turn students back to the scientific practice; (2) supporting students in naming observed phenomena, which involved a sequence of questions to help students use scientific language; and (3) guiding students in sensemaking, which involved a sequence of questions to help students learn about scientific practices, describe evidence, and develop explanations. Although many of the discussions in this study were not yet student-centred, they provide an image of a teacher asking specific questions that move students towards reform-oriented instructio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09500693.2017.1366674

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Benedict-Chambers, A., Kademian, S. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S.
Affiliations
  • College of Education, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, USA
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
International Journal of Science Education
Published
2017-08-29
Volume
39
Issue
15
Pages
1977-2001
ISSN
  • 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5289
OpenAlex
W2753337746
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
  • BearWorks (Missouri State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1007753)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
teacher questioning, sensemaking, scientific practice, student-centred instruction, science education reform, classroom discourse, scientific language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review