The use of self-determination theory to investigate career aspiration, choice of major and academic achievement of tertiary science students
Abstract
This study investigated the interrelationships among university entrance score, career aspiration, academic major, and academic achievement, of foundation year students, at an overall level and at completion of each year level of a Bachelor of Science (BSc) degree. Self-determination theory (SDT) was used as the underlying model for this study, which comprised 157 students who had completed their degree over 2015–2017. Results were analysed in terms of students’ intrinsic motivations (career aspiration and academic major), extrinsic motivations (university entrance score and academic success) and an amotivational factor (gender). We propose a model to explain the observed change in importance between BSc students’ extrinsic and intrinsic motivations, as a function of time and their increasing autonomy. If our results reflect broader patterns among Australian students undertaking post-secondary education, the use of grounded SDT-based approaches during foundation year may allow students to make more informed choices of academic major, and through this enhance their academic achievement.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SDT mainly focuses on revealing intrinsic motivation related to learning situations, extrinsic motivation of autonomy, and other factors affecting individual mental health.
“SDT mainly focuses on revealing the intrinsic motivation related to learning situations, the extrinsic motivation of autonomy, and other factors affecting individual mental health [10].”
From Mapping the Research Landscape: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Self-Determination Theory in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Increasing autonomy for students will make them more motivated to learn and achieve better grades or outcomes.
“The academic consensus points out that increasing autonomy for students will make them more motivated to learn and achieve better grades or outcomes [10], [15].”
From Mapping the Research Landscape: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Self-Determination Theory in Higher Education (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · see citing works
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 27,815 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ramirez, K. B. C., Ong, A. K. S., & Tablan, J. P. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105286 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lin, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., & Wu, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 2nd International Conference on Information Education and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1145/3724504.3724576
- Authors
- Rayner, G., & Papakonstantinou, T.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Rayner, Gerry
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-06-14
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1635-1652
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W3034265927
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- self-determination theory, career aspirations, college major choice, academic performance, university entrance scores, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amotivation, gender differences, student independence, foundation year students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review