Cited by 18Science Education and PedagogyScience Education and PerceptionsEvolution and Science Education

Using video-elicitation focus group interviews to explore pre-service science teachers’ views and reasoning on artificial intelligence

Open access
Karahan, Engin·2023·International Journal of Science Education

Abstract

Using video-elicitation focus group interviews, this study aims to reveal pre-service science teachers’ perspectives and reasoning on artificial intelligence as a socioscientific issues-based scenario. Hence, it illustrates the ways the video data were used in the focus group elicitation interviews to understand their interpretations of how their beliefs align with a hypothetical future scenario around artificial intelligence. To demonstrate the phenomenon in depth, a case study design was used. The participants of the study involved 45 third and fourth-year undergraduate students enrolled in a science teacher education programme. For this study, the researcher conducted six open-ended, unstructured video-elicitation focus group interviews. The data was analysed using Dey’s (1993. Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. Routledge) qualitative analysis steps of description, qualification, and association. The findings indicated that the participants’ views and reasoning vary in the context of artificial intelligence technologies. The fictional scenario depicted in the video-elicitation interviews both helped and challenged them to share their perspectives on the issue. Moreover, several aspects of SSI were thoroughly discussed during the interviews.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09500693.2023.2200887

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 18

Authors
Karahan, E.
Affiliations
Middle East Technical University (TR)
Corresponding author
Karahan, Engin
Venue
International Journal of Science Education
Published
2023-04-25
Volume
45
Issue
15
Pages
1283-1302
ISSN
  • 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5289
OpenAlex
W4366991456
Cited by
18
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4
FWCI
13.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • International Journal of Science Education (publishedVersion)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, pre-service science teachers, socioscientific issues, focus groups, teacher beliefs, science teacher education, student reasoning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review