The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions
Abstract
This study begins the task of mapping out the domain of valid, potentially helpful beliefs of students and raises the possibility of drawing on these intuitions in teaching conceptual material. Some issues are explored surrounding the identification of such intuitions, referred to as anchoring conceptions or anchors. We attempt to: (1) propose some organizing theoretical and observational definitions of the anchor construct; (2) present some initial findings from a diagnostic test designed to uncover anchors for physics instruction; and (3) provoke an initial discussion of the new methodological issues that arise in this domain. The results of the diagnostic test indicate that a number of group anchors exist. In addition, some unexpected non‐anchors were identified. Furthermore, evidence was found indicating that some anchoring examples may be ‘brittle’, i.e., evidence that the anchor could not be extended analogically to help a student make sense of a target situation. Finally, it is suggested that further research is needed to construct a theory of anchoring conceptions that would, for example, specify what characteristics would indicate that an anchoring conception can provide the basis for conceptual change via analogical extension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Implication of Research on Teacher Belief
Kagan, D. M. (1992) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6 · Cited by 1,873
Singer, S., & Smith, K. A. (2013) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20030 · Cited by 835
A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science
Kaltakci Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015) · EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education · doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a · Cited by 432
Using Questioning to Guide Student Thinking
van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0602_3 · Cited by 342
Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators
Mathewson, J. H. (1999) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199901)83:1<33::aid-sce2>3.0.co;2-z · Cited by 342
Metadata
- Authors
- Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 554-565
- ISSN
- 0950-0693 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5289
- OpenAlex
- W2009377869
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0950069890110507
- The paper
- Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.