The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revisiting the Continua of Biliteracy: International and Critical Perspectives
Abstract
The continua model of biliteracy offers a framework in which to situate research, teaching, and language planning in linguistically diverse settings. Arguing from this model, and citing examples of Cambodian and Puerto Rican students in Philadelphia's public schools as illustrative of the challenge facing American educators, Hornberger has suggested that the more their learning contexts allow learners to draw on all points of the continua, the greater are the chances for their full biliterate development. The present paper revisits the continua model from the perspective of several international cases of educational policy and practice in linguistically diverse settings - Brazil, Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia, and from a critical perspective which seeks to make explicit the power relationships which define bi(multi)literacies in these contexts. Building from these perspectives and from continuing research in Philadelphia's Cambodian and Puerto Rican communities, we propose an expanded continua model which takes into account not only biliterate contexts, media, and development, but also, crucially, the content of biliteracy. We conclude with comments on how the insights of the continua model of biliteracy can contribute to our understanding not only of linguistically diverse classrooms, but also of all classrooms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The economics of linguistic exchanges
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847701600601 · Cited by 2,048
Cited by
(2005) · Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.) · Cited by 466
Translanguaging in Today's Classrooms: A Biliteracy Lens
Hornberger, N. H., & Link, H. (2012) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2012.726051 · Cited by 186
Self-citationT(w)o and fro: using the L1 as a language teaching tool in the CLIL classroom
Gallagher, F., & Colohan, G. (2017) · The Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.947382 · Cited by 43
“Given our increasingly multilingual classrooms, the link between various models of language immersion (Hornberger and Skilton-Sylvester 2003; Fortune and Tedick 2008; Cenoz, Genesee and Gorter 2013; Gallagher and Leahy 2014) and other language learning contexts (Coyle, Hood and Marsh 2010;…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hornberger, N. H., & Skilton-Sylvester, E.
- Venue
- Language and Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-122
- ISSN
- 0950-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7581
- OpenAlex
- W2070816658
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisiting the Continua of Biliteracy: International and Critical Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09500780008666781
- The paper
- Hornberger, N. H., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2000). Revisiting the Continua of Biliteracy: International and Critical Perspectives. Language and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780008666781
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.