CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Postcolonial and Cultural Literary StudiesCultural Studies and ColonialismMemory, Trauma, and Testimony

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Writing, representation, and postcolonial nostalgia

Walder, Dennis·2009·Textual Practice
DOI 10.1080/09502360903361709
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This work reflects upon a facet of memory that has a special resonance for those of us entangled by the long histories of colonialism and decolonisation – nostalgia.1 Nostalgia is a cultural phenom...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09502360903361709

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Walder, D.
Affiliations
The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Walder, Dennis
ORCID
Walder, Dennis
Venue
Textual Practice
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-12
Volume
23
Issue
6
Pages
935-946
ISSN
  • 0950-236X (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1308
DOI
10.1080/09502360903361709
OpenAlex
W2043979959
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Textual Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Studies and Colonialism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Memory, Trauma, and Testimony
Keywords
nostalgia, memory, colonialism, decolonization, representation, writing, cultural memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Writing, representation, and postcolonial nostalgia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09502360903361709
The paper
Walder, D. (2009). Writing, representation, and postcolonial nostalgia. Textual Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502360903361709