Cited by 44Reproductive Health and ContraceptionReproductive Health and TechnologiesMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Identification and prediction of the fertile window with a new web-based medical device using a vaginal biosensor for measuring the circadian and circamensual core body temperature

Open access
Regidor, Pedro-Antonio, Kaczmarczyk, Marta, Schiweck, Esther, Goeckenjan-Festag, Maren, Alexander, Henry·2018·Gynecological Endocrinology

Abstract

Fertility awareness-based (FAB) methods represent a term that includes all family planning methods that are based on the identification of the fertile window. They are based on the woman's observation of physiological signs of the fertile and infertile phases of the menstrual cycle. The first approach consists basically in symptothermal methods accompanied by cervical mucus measurements and clinical menstrual cycling data recording. The second most often used methods are the urinary measurement of E3G and luteinizing hormone (LH) with a personalized computer system. Hence these systems lack the efficacy of the continuous circadian and circamensual measurement of the core body temperature. Only this approach enables the accurate detection of the ovulation during the fertile window. A new medical device called OvulaRing has been developed to fill this gap. In the present study, the system and its first clinical results are presented. OvulaRing is a medical device used just like a tampon. The device is a vaginal ring of evatane that contains an integrated biosensor. This sensor measures continuously every 5 min the core body temperature throughout the entire cycle. This device allows a circadian and circamensual intravaginal exact measurement. With this system, 288 measurements are created per day. The system can detect retrospectively and predict prospectively the fertile window of the users. One hundred and fifty eight women aged between 18 and 45 years used this medical device in an open non-randomized clinical study for 15 months. A total of 470 cycles could be recorded and were able for analysis. By the same time in a subgroup of patients, hormonal assessments of LH, follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol and progesterone as well as vaginal ultrasound were performed in parallel between the 9th and the 36th day of the cycle. The validation error due to software errors was 0.89% for the retrospective analysis; that means that the accuracy for the detection of the ovulation was 99.11%. Accuracy of 88.8% for a window of 3 days before ovulation, the day of ovulation and the 3 days after ovulation was achieved for the prospective analysis. In the subgroup of woman with recorded pregnancies, it could be shown that after 3.79 months of use (median) pregnancies were observed. In 67.72% in up to 3 months, in 16.36% between 3 and 6 months of use, in 7.27% between 7 and 9 months, in 5.45% between 10 and 12 months and in 1.82% between 13 and 15 months of use of the system. With this new web-based system, a precise determination of the fertile window even in women with ultralong cycles (>35 days) could be detected independently of their personal live circumstances. Exact determination of the fertile window is herewith possible so that OvulaRing represents an evolution in the FAB method for the cycle diagnosis of women with regular, irregular or anovulatory menstrual cycles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09513590.2017.1390737

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 44

Authors
Regidor, P.-A., Kaczmarczyk, M., Schiweck, E., Goeckenjan-Festag, M., & Alexander, H.
Affiliations
  • Exeltis West Europe & Germany, Ismaning, Germany;
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Corresponding author
Regidor, Pedro-Antonio
Venue
Gynecological Endocrinology
Published
2017-10-28
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
256-260
ISSN
  • 0951-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0766
OpenAlex
W2765548329
Cited by
44
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gynecological Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
fertility awareness-based methods, ovulation detection, vaginal ring, core body temperature, symptothermal method, natural family planning, pregnancy outcomes, menstrual cycle monitoring, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone, progesterone
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Body Temperature, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Fertility, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Ovulation, Biosensing Techniques, Ovulation Prediction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review