Impact of body mass index and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) subtypes on periodontal health in Chinese women with PCOS and periodontitis
Open accessAbstract
Background This study aimed to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) subtypes on periodontal parameters in Chinese women with PCOS and periodontitis.Method We conducted a retrospective case-control study analyzing data from 88 women with PCOS and 82 healthy controls. Participants were categorized by BMI (<24.0 kg/m2and ≥24.0 kg/m2) and PCOS subtypes. We compared periodontal parameters [including probing depth (PD), gingival bleeding index (GBI)] and reproductive hormone-related parameters.Results Women with PCOS and periodontitis had a significantly higher GBI (2.71 ± 0.53) compared to controls (2.25 ± 0.41, p < 0.0001). Among patients with BMI <24.0 kg/m2, those with PCOS had a younger age [25.00(5.00) vs. 26.00(6.00) years, p < 0.05], lower PD [3.24(0.55) mm vs. 3.43 (0.48) mm, p < 0.01], and higher GBI [2.63(0.76) vs. 2.23(0.55), p < 0.0001]. For BMI ≥24.0 kg/m2, PCOS patients had a higher GBI [2.91(0.36) vs. 2.38(0.59), p < 0.01] but a lower percentage of severe periodontal disease (p < 0.05).Conclusion PCOS could potentially worsen gingival inflammation among women already suffering from periodontitis, and a higher BMI might further intensify this correlation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The required sample size was determined using G*Power; a minimum of 52 participants per group was required.
“The required sample size was determined using G*Power (version 3.1.9.7, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany). The power analysis was conducted to detect an effect size of 0.5 with a two-tailed test, a significance level of 0.05, and a statistical power of 80%. The results indicated that a minimum of 52 participants per group was required [18].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Keyif, B., & Yavuzcan, A. (2025) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina61030424 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“The results indicated that a minimum of 52 participants per group was required [18].”
- Authors
- Liu, X., Wang, F., Wang, X., & Luan, Q.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Xiao
- Luan, Qingxian
- Venue
- Gynecological Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2024-09-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2405097-2405097
- ISSN
- 0951-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0766
- OpenAlex
- W4402709408
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Gynecological Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Oral and gingival health research
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, periodontitis, body mass index, PCOS subtypes, gingivitis, gingival bleeding index, probing depth, reproductive hormones, Chinese women
- MeSH terms
- East Asian People, Adult, China, Female, Humans, Periodontal Index, Periodontitis, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Retrospective Studies, Body Mass Index, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review