Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vicarious traumatization and secondary traumatic stress: A research synthesis∗

Baird, Katie, Kracen, Amanda C.·2006·Counselling Psychology Quarterly

Abstract

Vicarious traumatization (VT) refers to harmful changes that occur in professionals’ views of themselves, others, and the world, as a result of exposure to the graphic and/or traumatic material of their clients. Secondary traumatic stress (STS) refers to a set of psychological symptoms that mimic post-traumatic stress disorder, but is acquired through exposure to persons suffering the effects of trauma. Numerous studies have sought to identify correlates of both VT and STS, yet there still exists a lack of conceptual clarity in the literature about VT, STS, and the related constructs of burnout and compassion fatigue. This has made it difficult to use the literature to inform practice and training. This study clarifies the definitions of VT and STS and uses levels of evidence analysis to synthesize the research findings to date. Originally planned as a meta-analysis, the study was re-designed as methodological issues in the literature became apparent that would call into question the validity of a meta-analysis. The current method of analysis documents the degree of evidence for the most commonly researched factors that have been researched as possible contributors to the development of both VT and STS, synthesizing the findings of published research and dissertations written in the English language from 1994–2003. Findings indicate that persuasive evidence exists for personal trauma history, reasonable evidence for perceived coping style, and some evidence for supervision experiences, as important predictors of VT. Persuasive evidence for amount of exposure to trauma material and reasonable evidence for personal trauma history are indicated as important in the development of STS. Limitations of the current study and directions for further research are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09515070600811899

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Allt J, 1999, Vicarious trauma: A survey of clinical and counselling psychologists.
  2. Brady JL, 1999, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 386, 10.1037/0735-7028.30.4.386 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Camerlengo H, 2002, The role of coping style, job-related stress, and personal victimization history in the vicarious traumatization of professionals who work with abused youth.
  4. Cooper H, 1994, The handbook of research synthesis
  5. Creamer TL, 2002, Secondary trauma and coping processes among disaster mental health workers responding to the September 11 attacks.
  6. Dickes SJ, 1998, Treating sexually abused children versus adults: An exploration of secondary traumatic stress and vicarious traumatization among therapists.
  7. Figley C, 1995, Compassion fatigue
  8. Follette VM, 1994, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25, 275, 10.1037/0735-7028.25.3.275 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Myers TW, 2002, Treating compassion fatigue
  10. Nelson-Gardell D, 2003, Child Welfare, 5
  11. Pearlman LA, 1995, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 558, 10.1037/0735-7028.26.6.558 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Pearlman LA, 1995, Trauma and the therapist: Countertransference and vicarious traumatization in psychotherapy with incest survivors
  13. Price M, 2001, Secondary traumatization: Vulnerability factors for mental health professionals.
  14. Schauben LJ, 1995, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 49, 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00278.x · DOI
  15. Simonds SL, 1996, Vicarious traumatization in therapists treating adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse.
  16. Stamm B, 1999, Secondary traumatic stress: Self-care issues for clinicians, researchers, and educators
  17. Trippany RL, 2000, Predictors of vicarious traumatization: Female therapists for adult survivors versus female therapists for child survivors of sexual victimization.
  18. Weaks KA, 1999, Effects of treating trauma survivors: Vicarious trauma and style of coping.
  19. Wee DF, 2002, Treating compassion fatigue
  20. Young CM, 1999, Vicarious trauma in psychotherapists who work with physically or sexually abused children.

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Baird, K., & Kracen, A. C.
Venue
Counselling Psychology Quarterly
Published
2006-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
181-188
ISSN
  • 0951-5070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3674
OpenAlex
W2071804107
Cited by
447
References
2
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.