The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaffoldings of the affective mind
Abstract
In this paper we adopt Sterelny's (2010) framework of the scaffolded mind, and his related dimensional approach, to highlight the many ways in which human affectivity (and not just cognition) is environmentally supported. After discussing the relationship between the scaffolded-mind view and related frameworks, such as the extended-mind view, we illustrate the many ways in which our affective states are environmentally supported by items of material culture, other people, and their interplay. To do so, we draw on empirical evidence from various disciplines (sociology, ethnography, and developmental psychology), and develop phenomenological considerations to distinguish different ways in which we experience the world affectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1982) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203981139 · Cited by 9,841
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 6,333 · cited 2×
“Clark and Chalmers’ (1998) central example involves a single person, Otto, who carries a notebook in which he annotates important information he would otherwise forget, and which he consults whenever he needs to.”
BackgroundSearle, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5834.001.0001 · Cited by 3,595
Gallagher, S. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199271941.001.0001 · Cited by 3,311
(2003) · Cited by 2,898
DeNora, T. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511489433 · Cited by 2,705
Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-0788 · Cited by 2,209
Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension
Clark, A. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001 · Cited by 2,201
How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds
Hutchins, E. (1995) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1903_1 · Cited by 1,880 · cited 1×
“This example nicely illustrates what others have called distributed cognition (e.g., Hutchins, 1995).”
BackgroundIdeas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy
(1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2233-4 · Cited by 1,666
Cited by
Mind Invasion: Situated Affectivity and the Corporate Life Hack
Slaby, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00266 · Cited by 157
Fusaroli, R., Bjørndahl, J. S., Roepstorff, A., & Tylén, K. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000207 · Cited by 76
Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020) · Culture, Mind, and Brain · doi:10.1017/9781108695374.010 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Colombetti, G., & Krueger, J.
- Venue
- Philosophical Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-11-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1157-1176
- ISSN
- 0951-5089 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-394X
- OpenAlex
- W2117034370
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaffoldings of the affective mind. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09515089.2014.976334
- The paper
- Colombetti, G., & Krueger, J. (2015). Scaffoldings of the affective mind. Philosophical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2014.976334
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
