Cited by 185Online and Blended LearningLearning Styles and Cognitive DifferencesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Cross Cultural Differences in Online Learning Motivation

Lim, Doo H·2004·Educational Media International

Abstract

Globalization and technology are two of the many drivers that impact today’s education, locally and internationally. The purpose of the research study was to identify how online learners in Korea and the US perceived online learning motivation differently and what learner characteristics and cultural orientation affected the online learners’ learning motivation. Major findings revealed that there was a significant difference in learning motivation between the US and Korean online learners. The study also discusses how cultural orientation and learner characteristics affected the learning motivation of online learners for each country. Différences interculturelles de la motivation de formation en ligne. La globalisation et la technologie représentent deux conducteurs qui ont l’impact sur l’éducation d’aujourd’hui localement et internationalement. Le but de cette étude de recherche était d’identifier comment les étudiants en Corée et aux Etats‐Unis perçoivent la motivation de formation en ligne différemment et comment les caractéristiques des étudiants et leur orientation culturelle affectent leur motivation de formation en ligne. Les conclusions principales révèlent qu’il y a une différence significante concernant la motivation de formation entre les étudiants en ligne des Etats‐Unis et de Corée. L’étude explique également comment l’orientation culturelle et les caractéristiques des étudiants affectent la motivation de formation des étudiants en ligne pour chaque pays. Untersc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09523980410001685784

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lim (2004) found that American students indicated they prefer voicing personal opinions during class, enjoy learning, and enroll in classes to obtain a sense of belonging.

    “while American students indicated they 'prefer voicing personal opinions during class, enjoy learning and enroll in classes to obtain a sense of belonging,'”

    From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Lim, 2004

  • Lim's (2004) findings supported his contention that cultural orientation influences national groups' learning motivation in ALNs.

    “These findings supported Lim's contention that cultural orientation influences national groups' learning motivation in ALNs.”

    From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Lim, 2004

  • Lim (2004) found that Korean students expressed a tendency to avoid voicing their opinions and keep passive and quiet during class as they are influenced by the authoritarian classroom context of Asian culture.

    “Korean students expressed their tendency to 'avoid voicing their opinions and keep passive and quiet during class as they are influenced by the authoritarian classroom context of Asian culture' (169-170).”

    From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Lim, 2004

  • Lim (2004) found that regardless of country affiliation, all students considered course relevancy as the most important motivational factor in their online learning.

    “The findings were that regardless of the country affiliation, all students considered course relevancy (belief that a particular course matches a student's needs) as the most important motivational factor in their online learning.”

    From Questions of Culture in Distance Learning: A Research Review (2009) · cites this paper as Lim, 2004

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 185

Authors
Lim, D. H.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Lim, Doo H
Venue
Educational Media International
Published
2004-09
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
163-175
ISSN
  • 0952-3987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5790
OpenAlex
W2118198206
Cited by
185
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Media International (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
online learning motivation, cross-cultural comparison, cultural orientation, learner characteristics, online students, Korean language learners, globalization, educational technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review