The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Personal inquiry: innovations in participatory design and models for inquiry learning
Abstract
This paper describes a participatory design approach to the development of inquiry‐based learning supported through a technology toolkit. The work is part of an interdisciplinary project – Personal Inquiry (PI). The paper focuses on the approach we adopted, concentrating in particular on the two mediating artefacts we used to guide and frame the design process during two design workshops. The first mediating artefact used was an inquiry framework developed as part of the wider PI project and the second was Kellett’s enquiry research bubbles, which is a framework to guide enquiry‐based thinking processes. The paper reports on data collected during the workshops and reflects on the value of the approach adopted. The paper also explores the PI‐team’s own reflections on the design process and its role in the overall project.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several authors have included Discussion as a culminating inquiry phase (Bruce & Casey, 2012;Conole, Scanlon, Littleton, Kerawalla, & Mulholland, 2010;Valanides & Angeli, 2008), while others consider Conclusion as the final stage of an inquiry cycle (de Jong & van Joolingen, 2008;National Research Council, 1996;Tatar, 2012).”
From Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle (2015) · cites this paper as Conole, Scanlon, Littleton, Kerawalla, & Mulholland, 2010
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Albirini A., 2007, Educational Technology and Society, 10, 227
- Alexander B., 2006, Learning, 41, 32
- Anastopoulou, S., Kerawalla, L., Littleton, K., Ainsworth, S., Twiner, A. and Concole, G.Facilitating the expression of learner voices in the participatory design of technology to support inquiry learning, Conference Proceedings, CAL 2009: Learning in Digital Words. March2009, Brighton, UK.
- Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., Wright, M., Martin, H., Ainsworth, S. and O’Malley, C. Learning 21st century science in context with mobile technologies. Proceedings of mLearn 2008 Conference, The bridge from text to context. Edited by: Traxler, J., Gordan, B. and Bennett, C. October. pp.12–19. Wolverhampton, UK: University of Wolverhampton. 7–10 October 2008.
- Borgman C.L., 2009, Fostering learning in the networked world: The cyberlearning opportunity and challenge, US National Science Foundation (NSF) publication
- Botturi L., 2007, Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: Theories and practices, 10.4018/978-1-59904-729-4 · DOI
- Carr‐Chellman A.A., 2010, Instructional design for teachers: Improving classroom practice, 10.4324/9780203847275 · DOI
- Clough, G., Conole, G. and Scanlon, E. Using participatory evaluation to support collaboration in an inter‐disciplinary context. The Networked Learning Conference. Aalborg, Denmark.
- Collins, T.D., Gaved, M.B., Mulholland, P., Kerawalla, L.J., Twiner, A., Scanlon, E. and Tosunoglu, C. Supporting location‐based inquiry learning across school, field and home contexts. The Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (mLearn‐2008). Telford, UK. …
- Conole G., 2008, Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, 187
- Conole, G., Scanlon, E., Kerawalla, L., Anastoupoulou, S. and Blake, C. From design to narrative: The development of inquiry‐based learning models. Proceedings of EDMEDIA 08. Vienna.
- Conole, G., Scanlon, E., Kerawalla, C., Mullholland, P., Anastopulou, S. and Blake, C. From design to narrative: The development of inquiry‐based learning model, Conference Proceedings. World conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunication (EDMEDIA). June‐4 July302008, Vienna, Austria.
- Cross, S., Conole, G., Clark, P., Drasher, A. and Weller, M. Mapping a landscape of learning design: Identifying key trend in current practice at the Open University. Conference Proceedings, European LAMS conference. June25–272008, Cadiz, Spain.
- Daniels H., 2007, Cambridge companion to Vygotsky, 10.1017/CCOL0521831040 · DOI
- 10.1080/02680510802625443 · DOI
- Dillenbourg P., 2002, Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL?, 61
- Engeström Y., 1987, Learning by expanding: An activity‐theoretical approach to developmental research
- Engeström Y., 1999, Perspectives on activity theory, 10.1017/CBO9780511812774 · DOI
- Iiyoshi T., 2008, Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge
- James A., 2004, Childhood: Theory, policy and practice
- Lansdown G., 2001, Promoting children’s participation in democratic decision making
- 10.1007/s10798-006-0002-1 · DOI
- Norris C., 2003, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 15, 10.1080/15391523.2003.10782400 · DOI
- 10.1002/chi.817 · DOI
- Stegman, K., Kollar, I., Zoltmann, J., Girjler, H., de Jong, T. and Dillenbourg, P. Towards the convergence of CSCL and inquiry learning: Scripting collaborative inquiry learning.Proceedings of the 8th international conference on computer supported collaborative learning. Edited by: Chinn, C., Erkens, E. and Puntambekar, S. pp.831–832. New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences. Mice, minds & society: CSCL (2007), Retrieved November 26, 2009, fromhttp://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1599758&dl=GUIDE&coll=GUIDE&CFID=65080610&CFTOKEN=82216109
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 · Cited by 2,119
Metadata
- Authors
- Conole, G., Scanlon, E., Littleton, K., Kerawalla, L., & Mulholland, P.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- ORCID
- Mulholland, Paul
- Venue
- Educational Media International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 277-292
- ISSN
- 0952-3987 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5790
- OpenAlex
- W2033207901
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Media International (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- participatory design, inquiry-based learning, mediating artefacts, design workshop, design process reflection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
