Application of a semi-automated vocal fingerprinting approach to monitor Bornean gibbon females in an experimentally fragmented landscape in Sabah, Malaysia
Open accessAbstract
Vocal individuality has been documented in a variety of mammalian species and it has been proposed that this individuality can be used as a vocal fingerprint to monitor individuals. Here we provide and test a classification method using Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) to extract features from Bornean gibbon female calls. Our method is semi-automated as it requires manual pre-processing to identify and extract calls from the original recordings. We compared two methods of MFCC feature extraction: (1) averaging across all time windows and (2) creating a standardized number of time windows for each call. We analysed 376 calls from 33 gibbon females and, using linear discriminant analysis, found that we were able to improve female identification accuracy from 95.7% with spectrogram features to 98.4% accuracy when averaging MFCCs across time windows, and 98.9% accuracy when using a standardized number of windows. We divided our data randomly into training and test data-sets, and tested the accuracy of support vector machine (SVM) predictions over 100 iterations. We found that we could predict female identity in the test data-set with a 98.8% accuracy. Using SVM on our entire data-set, we were able to predict female identity with 99.5% accuracy (validated by leave-one-out cross-validation). Lastly, we used the method presented here to classify four females recorded during three or more recording seasons using SVM with limited success. We provide evidence that MFCC feature extraction is effective for distinguishing between female Bornean gibbons, and make suggestions for future vocal fingerprinting applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CNN- and MFCC-based models can now recognize individuals with 95-99% accuracy across taxa, from gibbons to lions, and multi-task networks can generalize across different call types.
“CNN- and MFCC-based models can now recognize individuals with 95–99% accuracy across taxa, from gibbons to lions, and multi-task networks even manage to generalize across different call types”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Clink et al. 2018
Gibbon duets, lion roars, and rook calls carry distinctive signatures that can be used to track individuals over time.
“Gibbon duets, lion roars, and rook calls have all been shown to carry distinctive signatures that can be used to track individuals over time”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Clink et al. 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 44
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kuhn M. 2008. Caret package. J Stat So w. 28(5):1-26.
- Authors
- Clink, D. J., Crofoot, M. C., & Marshall, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clink, Dena J.
- Venue
- Bioacoustics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-01-16
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 193-209
- ISSN
- 0952-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 2165-0586
- OpenAlex
- W2782918236
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- nbn-resolving.de
- Locations
- Bioacoustics (publishedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Primate Conservation Inc. (PCI 1044)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- Hylobates, vocal individuality, female identification, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, acoustic monitoring, habitat fragmentation, linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, spectrogram features
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review