Cited by 44Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorMusic and Audio ProcessingPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Application of a semi-automated vocal fingerprinting approach to monitor Bornean gibbon females in an experimentally fragmented landscape in Sabah, Malaysia

Open access
Clink, Dena J., Crofoot, Margaret C., Marshall, Andrew J.·2019·Bioacoustics

Abstract

Vocal individuality has been documented in a variety of mammalian species and it has been proposed that this individuality can be used as a vocal fingerprint to monitor individuals. Here we provide and test a classification method using Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) to extract features from Bornean gibbon female calls. Our method is semi-automated as it requires manual pre-processing to identify and extract calls from the original recordings. We compared two methods of MFCC feature extraction: (1) averaging across all time windows and (2) creating a standardized number of time windows for each call. We analysed 376 calls from 33 gibbon females and, using linear discriminant analysis, found that we were able to improve female identification accuracy from 95.7% with spectrogram features to 98.4% accuracy when averaging MFCCs across time windows, and 98.9% accuracy when using a standardized number of windows. We divided our data randomly into training and test data-sets, and tested the accuracy of support vector machine (SVM) predictions over 100 iterations. We found that we could predict female identity in the test data-set with a 98.8% accuracy. Using SVM on our entire data-set, we were able to predict female identity with 99.5% accuracy (validated by leave-one-out cross-validation). Lastly, we used the method presented here to classify four females recorded during three or more recording seasons using SVM with limited success. We provide evidence that MFCC feature extraction is effective for distinguishing between female Bornean gibbons, and make suggestions for future vocal fingerprinting applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09524622.2018.1426042

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNN- and MFCC-based models can now recognize individuals with 95-99% accuracy across taxa, from gibbons to lions, and multi-task networks can generalize across different call types.

    “CNN- and MFCC-based models can now recognize individuals with 95–99% accuracy across taxa, from gibbons to lions, and multi-task networks even manage to generalize across different call types”
  • Gibbon duets, lion roars, and rook calls carry distinctive signatures that can be used to track individuals over time.

    “Gibbon duets, lion roars, and rook calls have all been shown to carry distinctive signatures that can be used to track individuals over time”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 44

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kuhn M. 2008. Caret package. J Stat So w. 28(5):1-26.

Authors
Clink, D. J., Crofoot, M. C., & Marshall, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Clink, Dena J.
Venue
Bioacoustics
Published
2018-01-16
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
193-209
ISSN
  • 0952-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-0586
OpenAlex
W2782918236
Cited by
44
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioacoustics (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Primate Conservation Inc. (PCI 1044)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Hylobates, vocal individuality, female identification, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, acoustic monitoring, habitat fragmentation, linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, spectrogram features

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review