Pre-processing spectrogram parameters improve the accuracy of bioacoustic classification using convolutional neural networks
Open accessAbstract
A variety of automated classification approaches have been developed to extract species detection information from large bioacoustic datasets. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are an image classification technique that can be operated on the spectrogram of an audio recording. Using CNNs for bioacoustic classification negates the need for sophisticated feature extraction techniques; however, CNNs may be sensitive to the parameters used to create spectrograms. We used AlexNet to classify spectrograms of audio clips from 19 species of birdsong. We trained and tested AlexNet with the spectrograms and observed that mean classification accuracy ranged from 88.9% to 96.9% depending on the parameters used to create the spectrogram. Classification accuracy was highest when we used a composite of four spectrograms with different combinations of scales for frequency and amplitude. Classification accuracy also varied depending on the FFT window size of the spectrogram. Overall, our results suggest that optimal spectrogram parameters for CNN classification may differ from those used for human visualization or other classification approaches. We suggest that if spectrogram parameters are appropriately selected, classification accuracy similar to current state-of-the-art methods can be achieved using off-the-shelf software and without the need to extract domain-specific features.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Machine learning for call detection and identification has traditionally required a significant amount of pre-processed data.
“Machine learning for call detection and identification has traditionally required a significant amount of pre‐processed data”
From Roars, Rumbles, and Resonance: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Crocodylian Acoustic Signals (2026) · cites this paper as Knight et al. 2020
Recent breakthroughs have demonstrated that less data can be sufficient for machine learning call detection and identification, depending on research goals.
“but recent breakthroughs have demonstrated that less data can be sufficient, depending on research goals (Knight et al. 2020; Eichinski et al. 2022).”
From Roars, Rumbles, and Resonance: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Crocodylian Acoustic Signals (2026) · cites this paper as Knight et al. 2020
In many studies, CNN accuracies land in the 89-97% range depending on spectrogram design, with composite representations usually coming out on top.
“In many studies, accuracies land in the 89–97% range depending on spectrogram design, with composite representations usually coming out on top”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as E. C. Knight et al. 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Knight, E. C., Poo Hernandez, S., Bayne, E. M., Bulitko, V., & Tucker, B. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Corresponding author
- Knight, Elly C.
- Venue
- Bioacoustics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-04-30
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 337-355
- ISSN
- 0952-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 2165-0586
- OpenAlex
- W2942893872
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Bioacoustics (publishedVersion)
- ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Alberta Conservation Association
- Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- bioacoustic classification, convolutional neural networks, AlexNet, bird song, species detection, automated species identification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review