The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A consistent input–output formulation of shared producer and consumer responsibility
Abstract
Growing interest in environmental and socio-economic accounting at the sub-regional and organisational level requires a consistent and comprehensive method for computing and reporting responsibility for impacts of industrial production such as water use, pollution, or employment. This work presents a formulation for allocating responsibility for production impacts consistently amongst all agents such as consumers, producers, workers, and investors throughout demand and supply chains, in a way that reflects their contribution to the production process. Generalised input–output theory is used to re-trace the flow of past inter-industrial transactions, and examine ex-post how, for example, inputs of resources or outputs of pollution were associated with these transactions. Introducing the concept of a responsibility share we enable the division of responsibility into mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive portions that are assigned to the different economic sectors, and that become consistently smaller as we move away from the location of the impact within the supply or demand chain system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
Self-citation
Cited by
From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories
Peters, G. P. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.014 · Cited by 1,162
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Turner, K., & Barrett, J. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.003 · Cited by 697
Self-citationShared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice
Lenzen, M., Murray, J., Sack, F., & Wiedmann, T. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.018 · Cited by 656
Self-citationThe growing importance of scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions from industry
Hertwich, E. G., & Wood, R. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae19a · Cited by 350
A research agenda for improving national Ecological Footprint accounts
Kitzes, J., Galli, A., Bagliani, M., Barrett, J., Dige, G., Ede, S., Erb, K., Giljum, S., Haberl, H., Hails, C., et al. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.022 · Cited by 326
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallego, B., & Lenzen, M.
- Venue
- Economic Systems Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 365-391
- ISSN
- 0953-5314 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5758
- OpenAlex
- W1986143841
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A consistent input–output formulation of shared producer and consumer responsibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09535310500283492
- The paper
- Gallego, B., & Lenzen, M. (2005). A consistent input–output formulation of shared producer and consumer responsibility. Economic Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310500283492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.