The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Increasing supply chain resilience in a global sourcing context
Open accessAbstract
Managing risk has emerged as an issue of critical importance for today's globalised supply chains. This article focuses on inbound supply risk in a global sourcing context, where increased distances between sources of supply and final markets add uncertainty to supply continuity through longer and more variable lead times. After an in-depth analysis of international supply process vulnerability, this article identifies a set of approaches for managing risk in order to enhance supply chain resilience. Then, a simulation-based framework for assessing the effectiveness of the proposed approaches was developed and applied on a real case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of procurement
Roberta Pereira, C., Christopher, M., & Lago Da Silva, A. (2014) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-09-2013-0346 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Colicchia, C., Dallari, F., & Melacini, M.
- Venue
- Production Planning & Control
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-07-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 680-694
- ISSN
- 0953-7287 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5871
- OpenAlex
- W2127650649
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increasing supply chain resilience in a global sourcing context. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09537280903551969
- The paper
- Colicchia, C., Dallari, F., & Melacini, M. (2010). Increasing supply chain resilience in a global sourcing context. Production Planning & Control. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537280903551969
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
