The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: a dynamic capability view
Open accessAbstract
This study examines the effects of supply chain agility (SCAG) and supply chain resilience (SCRES) on performance under the moderating effect of organizational culture. We have used the dynamic capability view (DCV) to conceptualize our theoretical models for different phases of humanitarian supply chain (HSC) (pre and post-disaster phases). We used partial least squares (PLS) to examine the proposed research hypotheses using 335 responses gathered from organizations in India using questionnaires designed for a single respondent. The results suggest that SCAG and SCRES are two important dynamic capabilities of supply chain, have significant effects on pre-disaster performance (PRE-DP). The control orientation does not have significant effect on the path joining SCAG and PRE-DP. However, the control orientation has a significant interaction effect on the path joining SCRES and PRE-DP. Similarly, SCRES has significant effect on post-disaster performance (POST-DP) but SCAG has no significant effect on POST-DP. In contrast, the flexible orientation has significant moderation effects on the paths SCAG/SCRES and POST-DP. These findings contribute to our understanding of the differential effect of SCAG/SCRES on supply chain performance in different contexts. The results provide further understanding to develop appropriate strategies for different phases. Finally, limitations of our study and future research are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
Holling, C. S. (1973) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 · Cited by 18,995
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Organizational culture and leadership
(1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90120-5 · Cited by 16,462
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
(1993) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(93)92196-5 · Cited by 11,976
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114 · Cited by 8,490
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005 · Cited by 6,312
Cited by
Ivanov, D. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922 · Cited by 2,280
Impact of COVID-19 on logistics systems and disruptions in food supply chain
Singh, S., Kumar, R., Panchal, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1792000 · Cited by 904
Belhadi, A., Mani, V., Kamble, S. S., Khan, S. A. R., & Verma, S. (2024) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-021-03956-x · Cited by 797
Reconfigurable supply chain: the X-network
Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1774679 · Cited by 501
Dey, P. K., Chowdhury, S., Abadie, A., Vann Yaroson, E., & Sarkar, S. (2024) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J.
- Venue
- Production Planning & Control
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-10-26
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1158-1174
- ISSN
- 0953-7287 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5871
- OpenAlex
- W2895586310
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 116
- FWCI
- 52.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: a dynamic capability view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09537287.2018.1542174
- The paper
- Altay, N., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2018). Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: a dynamic capability view. Production Planning & Control. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1542174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
