The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning for Sustainability Transition through Bounded Socio-technical Experiments in Personal Mobility
Abstract
A bounded socio-technical experiment (BSTE) attempts to introduce a new technology, service, or a social arrangement on a small scale. Many such experiments in personal mobility are ongoing worldwide. They are carried out by coalitions of diverse actors, and are driven by long term and large scale visions of advancing society’s sustainability agenda. This paper focuses on the processes of higher-order learning that occur through BSTEs. Based on the conceptual frameworks from theories of organizational learning, policy-oriented learning, and diffusion of innovation, we identify two types of learning: the first type occurs among the participants in the experiment and their immediate professional networks; the second type occurs in the society at large. Both types play a key role in the societal transition towards sustainable mobility systems. Two case studies, in which the Design for Sustainability Group at Technical University of Delft has participated, provide empirical data for the analysis. One case consists of development of a three-wheeled bike-plus vehicle (Mitka); the second case seeks to solve mobility problems on the Dutch island of Texel. We find that higher order learning of the first type occurs among the BSTE participants and beyond. Learning can be facilitated by deployment of structured visioning exercises, by diffusion of ideas among related BSTEs, by innovative couplings of problems and solutions, and by creating links among related experiments. Government agencies, universities and other intellectual entrepreneurs have key roles to play in making that happen. The cases provide much less insights about the second type of learning. Research on the latter is necessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain
Hall, P. A. (1993) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/422246 · Cited by 7,369
Cited by
Geels, F. W. (2005) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320500357319 · Cited by 988
Trencher, G., Yarime, M., McCormick, K. B., Doll, C. N. H., & Kraines, S. B. (2014) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/sct044 · Cited by 656
Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review
Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031 · Cited by 615
Circular Economy in the building sector: Three cases and a collaboration tool
Leising, E., Quist, J., & Bocken, N. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.010 · Cited by 527
Luederitz, C., Schäpke, N., Wiek, A., Lang, D. J., Bergmann, M., Bos, J. J., Burch, S., Davies, A., Evans, J., König, A., et al. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005 · Cited by 367
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, H. S., Vergragt, P., Green, K., & Berchicci, L.
- Venue
- Technology Analysis & Strategic Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-315
- ISSN
- 0953-7325 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3990
- OpenAlex
- W2117994199
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning for Sustainability Transition through Bounded Socio-technical Experiments in Personal Mobility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09537320310001601496
- The paper
- Brown, H. S., Vergragt, P., Green, K., & Berchicci, L. (2003). Learning for Sustainability Transition through Bounded Socio-technical Experiments in Personal Mobility. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320310001601496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.