The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental Analysis of the Real-time Recurrent Learning Algorithm
Abstract
The real-time recurrent learning algorithm is a gradient-following learning algorithm for completely recurrent networks running in continually sampled time. Here we use a series of simulation experiments to investigate the power and properties of this algorithm. In the recurrent networks studied here, any unit can be connected to any other, and any unit can receive external input. These networks run continually in the sense that they sample their inputs on every update cycle, and any unit can have a training target on any cycle. The storage required and computation time on each step are independent of time and are completely determined by the size of the network, so no prior knowledge of the temporal structure of the task being learned is required. The algorithm is nonlocal in the sense that each unit must have knowledge of the complete recurrent weight matrix and error vector. The algorithm is computationally intensive in sequential computers, requiring a storage capacity of the order of the third power of the number of units and a computation time on each cycle of the order of the fourth power of the number of units. The simulations include examples in which networks are taught tasks not possible with tapped delay lines—that is, tasks that require the preservation of state over potentially unbounded periods of time. The most complex example of this kind is learning to emulate a Turing machine that does a parenthesis balancing problem. Examples are also given of networks that do feedforward computations with unknown delays, requiring them to organize into networks with the correct number of layers. Finally, examples are given in which networks are trained to oscillate in various ways, including sinusoidal oscillation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning internal representations by error propagation
RUMELHART, D. E., HINTON, G. E., & WILLIAMS, R. J. (1988) · Readings in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50035-2 · Cited by 3,002
Self-citation
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
A Learning Algorithm for Continually Running Fully Recurrent Neural Networks
Williams, R. J., & Zipser, D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.2.270 · Cited by 4,369
Self-citationAhmed, R., Sreeram, V., Mishra, Y., & Arif, M. D. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109792 · Cited by 1,259
On recent advances in PV output power forecast
Raza, M. Q., Nadarajah, M., & Ekanayake, C. (2016) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2016.06.073 · Cited by 544
Thirty Years of Machine Learning: The Road to Pareto-Optimal Wireless Networks
Wang, J., Jiang, C., Zhang, H., Ren, Y., Chen, K.-C., & Hanzo, L. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2965856 · Cited by 486
Metadata
- Authors
- WILLIAMS, R. J., & ZIPSER, D.
- Venue
- Connection Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-111
- ISSN
- 0954-0091 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0494
- OpenAlex
- W1984205520
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Analysis of the Real-time Recurrent Learning Algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09540098908915631
- The paper
- WILLIAMS, R. J., & ZIPSER, D. (1989). Experimental Analysis of the Real-time Recurrent Learning Algorithm. Connection Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540098908915631
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.