Psychopathology of first episode psychosis in HIV-positive persons in comparison to first-episode schizophrenia:A neglected issue
Abstract
This study aims to detect different psychopathological dimensions in first-episode psychoses with different underlying causes. We evaluated 22 subjects with first-episode psychosis, who differed in biological variables (HIV-positive versus HIV-negative) and who were compared by using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-Reviewer, the 18-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and the Mini-Mental State Examination. HIV-positive subjects had higher mean scores on the global BPRS and on the paranoid Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale subscale compared with HIV-negative subjects. Conversely, higher prevalence of affective and anxious symptoms was found in the HIV-negative patients in comparison to HIV-positives. HIV-positives had significantly greater attention/concentration impairment than HIV-negative persons. In conclusion, taking into account psychopathological dimensions may help psychiatrists in clinical decision-making regarding the differential diagnosis of psychotic symptoms. The psychopathological pattern of first-episode psychosis in HIV-positive patients may represent an 'elementary model' of acute psychosis characterized by paranoid delusions in the absence of the usual affective symptoms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Psychosis occurs most commonly in patients with advanced HIV infection and severe immunosuppression.
“Psychosis occurs most commonly in patients with advanced HIV infection and severe immunosuppression.[10]”
From Management of psychiatric disorders with HIV and dermatological disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- De Ronchi, D., Bellini, F., Cremante, G., Ujkaj, M., Tarricone, I., Selleri, R., Quartesan, R., Piselli, M., & Scudellari, P.
- Affiliations
- a Institute of Psychiatry , University of Bologna , Bologna
- University of Bologna (IT)
- University of Perugia (IT)
- Venue
- AIDS Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 872-878
- ISSN
- 0954-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0451
- OpenAlex
- W2040536372
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIDS Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- first-episode psychosis, HIV infection, schizophrenia, psychopathology, persecutory delusions, positive and negative symptoms, affective symptoms, anxiety symptoms, differential diagnosis of psychosis, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Follow-Up Studies, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Male, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Psychopathology, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Socioeconomic Factors, Reproducibility of Results, HIV Infections, HIV Seronegativity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review