Validity of the K-10 in detecting DSM-IV-defined depression and anxiety disorders among HIV-infected individuals
Abstract
It has been suggested that an HIV diagnosis may increase the likelihood of mental disorders among infected individuals and that the progression of HIV may be hastened by mental disorders like anxiety and depression. Therefore, a brief screening measure, with good sensitivity/specificity for psychiatric diagnoses that could be given to HIV-infected individuals would be useful. We assessed the validity of the K-10, using the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview as the gold standard, in a sample of 429 HIV-infected adults enrolled in HIV care and treatment services near Cape Town, South Africa. There was significant agreement between the K-10 and the MINI-defined depressive and anxiety disorders. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that the K-10 showed agreeable sensitivity and specificity in detecting depression (area under the ROC curve, 0.77), generalized anxiety disorder (0.78), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (0.77). The K-10 may be a useful screening measure for detecting mood and anxiety disorders, including PTSD, in patients with HIV/AIDS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The K10 is a highly sensitive measure which outperforms other commonly used scales and correlates highly with diagnostic measures such as the MINI.
“K10, we will rely on while screening, is a highly sensitive measure which outperforms other commonly used scales and correlates highly with diagnostic measures such as the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).53 54”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Spies, G., Kader, K., Kidd, M., Smit, J., Myer, L., Stein, D. J., & Seedat, S.
- Affiliations
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Seedat, S.
- Venue
- AIDS Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1163-1168
- ISSN
- 0954-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0451
- OpenAlex
- W2077767663
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIDS Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation
- Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
- Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- Kessler K10, depression screening, anxiety disorders, HIV infection, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, diagnostic validity, sensitivity and specificity, HIV/AIDS
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, HIV Infections
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review