Cited by 57Homelessness and Social IssuesHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

The effects of a harm reduction housing program on the viral loads of homeless individuals living with HIV/AIDS

Hawk, Mary, Davis, Dana·2012·AIDS Care

Abstract

Although the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapies has increased survival rates for many individuals living with HIV/AIDS, chronically homeless individuals with the disease continue to experience poor clinical outcomes and high mortality rates in comparison to the general population living with HIV. Housing as a structural intervention for homeless people living with HIV/AIDS has been shown both to be feasible and to improve access to care. However, few studies report the impact of accessing stable housing on residents' viral load counts, even though viral load has been accepted as the best predictor of clinical prognosis for over a decade. The Open Door is a nonprofit agency that utilizes a harm reduction, housing first model of care to improve clinical outcomes for homeless people living with HIV. This article describes the first study that utilizes viral load to assess the effectiveness of a housing first approach. During the study period, we found that 69% of residents of The Open Door achieved undetectable viral loads, which far exceeds adherence rates ranging from 13 to 32% that were found in other studies of similar vulnerable populations. This finding supports the feasibility of this approach and its potential impact on reducing HIV morbidity, mortality, and secondary transmission. Given that the majority of the residents were active substance users during the study period and achieved undetectable viral loads, our findings also substantiate other studies demonstrating that substance users are able to maintain clinical adherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540121.2011.630352

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawk, M., & Davis, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Allegheny General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Hawk, Mary
Venue
AIDS Care
Published
2011-11-22
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
577-582
ISSN
  • 0954-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0451
OpenAlex
W1983351444
Cited by
57
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIDS Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
harm reduction, Housing First, homelessness, HIV/AIDS, viral load, antiretroviral therapy adherence, substance use, structural interventions, open doors
MeSH terms
Adult, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Feasibility Studies, Female, Health Status, HIV Seropositivity, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Public Housing, Residential Facilities, Social Support, Viral Load, Substance-Related Disorders, Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active, Harm Reduction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review