Cited by 12HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

The fluidity of disclosure: a longitudinal exploration of women’s experience and understanding of HIV disclosure in the context of pregnancy and early motherhood

Moses, Susan, Tomlinson, Mark·2013·AIDS Care

Abstract

HIV disclosure is emphasised as an important component of efforts to prevent HIV transmission, including those to prevent transmission from mother to child. Studies which approach disclosure as a dichotomous variable that is either present or absent have generated a significant body of research describing disclosure patterns, antecedents, barriers and consequences. This study joins a growing body of research which explores disclosure as a complex, selective and gradual process occurring within the context of relationships. Using a qualitative, longitudinal ethnographic approach, the study explores HIV-positive women's subjective experience of disclosure and how they make meaning and understand disclosure processes during pregnancy and early motherhood. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of field notes from participant observation and in-depth interview transcripts suggests that women may experience disclosure as a more fluid construct than previously assumed. In contrast to the traditional dichotomous and linear approach to understanding disclosure, the meaning ascribed to disclosure "events" and behaviours was changeable and even reversible over time. These shifts occurred alongside changes in women's internal, interpersonal and material worlds and served important psychological and social functions. The findings have important implications for HIV counsellors working to encourage disclosure in the context of prevention interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540121.2012.736606

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moses, S., & Tomlinson, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Moses, Susan
Venue
AIDS Care
Published
2013-05-08
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
667-675
ISSN
  • 0954-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0451
OpenAlex
W2134088634
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AIDS Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
HIV status disclosure, women living with HIV, pregnancy, early motherhood, mother-to-child HIV transmission, HIV counseling, HIV prevention interventions, women's relationships
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropology, Cultural, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Mothers, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Sexual Partners, Women, HIV Infections, Disclosure, Narration, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review