The fluidity of disclosure: a longitudinal exploration of women’s experience and understanding of HIV disclosure in the context of pregnancy and early motherhood
Abstract
HIV disclosure is emphasised as an important component of efforts to prevent HIV transmission, including those to prevent transmission from mother to child. Studies which approach disclosure as a dichotomous variable that is either present or absent have generated a significant body of research describing disclosure patterns, antecedents, barriers and consequences. This study joins a growing body of research which explores disclosure as a complex, selective and gradual process occurring within the context of relationships. Using a qualitative, longitudinal ethnographic approach, the study explores HIV-positive women's subjective experience of disclosure and how they make meaning and understand disclosure processes during pregnancy and early motherhood. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of field notes from participant observation and in-depth interview transcripts suggests that women may experience disclosure as a more fluid construct than previously assumed. In contrast to the traditional dichotomous and linear approach to understanding disclosure, the meaning ascribed to disclosure "events" and behaviours was changeable and even reversible over time. These shifts occurred alongside changes in women's internal, interpersonal and material worlds and served important psychological and social functions. The findings have important implications for HIV counsellors working to encourage disclosure in the context of prevention interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research drawing on qualitative longitudinal data in South Africa is very limited and tends to make maternal subjectivity contingent on other topics.
“Research drawing on qualitative longitudinal data is very limited and tends to make the maternal subjectivity contingent on other topics (for example, Moses and Tomlinson, 2012, and their focus on HIV disclosure) (37).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Torres, N. F., Watson, D., Mohlomi, L., Hlungwani, T., Gardiner, C. V., Muller-Kluits, N., Norris, S. A., Draper, C. E., & Pentecost, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Global Women's Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2026.1880613
- Authors
- Moses, S., & Tomlinson, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Stellenbosch University (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Moses, Susan
- ORCID
- Tomlinson, Mark
- Venue
- AIDS Care
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-05-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 667-675
- ISSN
- 0954-0121 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0451
- OpenAlex
- W2134088634
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIDS Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Keywords
- HIV status disclosure, women living with HIV, pregnancy, early motherhood, mother-to-child HIV transmission, HIV counseling, HIV prevention interventions, women's relationships
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anthropology, Cultural, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Mothers, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Sexual Partners, Women, HIV Infections, Disclosure, Narration, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review