Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 16HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsMedication Adherence and ComplianceHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correlates of and barriers to ART adherence among adherence-challenged people living with HIV in southern India

Open access

Abstract

Suboptimal adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) regimens can lead to the development of drug resistance, virologic and clinical failure, and, on the community level, the spread of drug-resistant HIV. To design effective interventions, it is crucial to understand locally specific barriers to optimal adherence. Self-report data from a cross-sectional sample of 527 adherence-challenged people living with HIV (PLWH) in the South-Indian state of Karnataka showed that they took on average 68% of prescribed doses in the past month. Large majorities of participants encountered individual (95%), social/structural (88%), and clinic/regimen (80%) adherence barriers. Multivariate linear regression analyses of past month adherence showed that disclosure to all adults in the household was positively related to adherence, as was employing a larger number of adherence strategies, perceiving more benefits of ART, and having been on ART for longer. Fears of stigmatization upon disclosure of HIV-status to friends and people at work were negatively related to adherence. These results suggest that some barriers, especially individual-level barriers like forgetfulness are very common and can be targeted with relatively simple individual-level strategies. Other barriers, related to fear of stigma and lack of disclosure may require family- or community-level interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540121.2020.1742862

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1177/2325957416661424 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/jia2.25066 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001416 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s10461-018-2157-7 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181ba3e4e · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10461-020-02785-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.inhe.2010.11.003 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f366ff · DOI
  9. 10.1186/1472-6963-13-198 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s40266-013-0107-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1310/JFXH-G3X2-EYM6-D6UG · DOI
  12. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000842 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Joshi B., 2014, The Indian Journal of Medical Research, 140, 84
  14. 10.1080/09540121.2014.946382 · DOI
  15. 10.1186/s12916-014-0142-1 · DOI
  16. 10.4103/2249-4863.192325 · DOI
  17. 10.4103/0970-0218.112435 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030438 · DOI · Paper page
  19. NACO, 2013, ART guidelines for HIV-infected adults and adolescents: May2013
  20. 10.1007/s10461-016-1631-3 · DOI
  21. 10.4103/0971-5916.166595 · DOI
  22. 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4531-4536.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.jana.2017.10.001 · DOI
  24. 10.1089/apc.2006.0045 · DOI
  25. 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.716 · DOI
  26. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002183 · DOI
  27. Shukla M., 2016, Indian Journal of Community Medicine : Official Publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 41, 55, 10.4103/0970-0218.170970 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s11904-009-0037-5 · DOI
  29. 10.1080/13548506.2010.521568 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.032 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.1228160 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/09540121.2011.630370 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s10461-018-02390-8 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Heylen, E., Chandy, S., Shamsundar, R., Nair, S., Ravi Kumar, B. N., & Ekstrand, M. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • St. John's National Academy of Health Sciences (IN)
  • Karnataka State AIDS Prevention Society, Bangalore, India
Corresponding author
Heylen, Elsa
Venue
AIDS Care
Published
2020-03-16
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
486-493
ISSN
  • 0954-0121 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0451
OpenAlex
W3011683726
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH095659)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
antiretroviral therapy adherence, people living with HIV, barriers to adherence, HIV status disclosure, stigma, forgetfulness, adherence strategies, treatment duration, drug resistance, Karnataka
MeSH terms
Assessment of Medication Adherence, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Fear, Female, Humans, India, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Social Support, HIV Infections, Drug Monitoring, Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active, Medication Adherence, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.