Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Let's chat!” Piloting a digital chatbot for HIV prevention among cisgender women and transgender men in Nigeria

Mathur, Sanyukta, Eromhonsele, Anita F., Vallarino, Zachary, Savel, Craig, Oche, Edward, Ononye, Olisa, Shoyemi, Elizabeth, Tun, Waimar·2025·AIDS Care

Abstract

Awareness and uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a highly efficacious medication for HIV prevention, remains low in many sub-Saharan African countries. This study explored the acceptability and feasibility of an HIV prevention chatbot tailored for cisgender women and transgender men in Lagos, Nigeria. The chatbot was developed and implemented in the Nigerian healthcare context using participatory approaches engaging HIV healthcare providers and representatives from the target populations to ensure that the content was appropriate, comprehensible, and non-stigmatizing. The chatbot included information about PrEP, HIV risk/ vulnerabilities, and self-assessment guidelines. The pilot was conducted among 150 participants (132 cisgender women and 18 transgender men) recruited at public health facilities and community health clinics. The chatbot was well-received by clients and healthcare providers and has the potential for rapid scale-up to facilitate PrEP uptake among HIV vulnerable populations. Participants reported the chatbot was easy to understand (97%), a good way to learn health information (99%), and that they would recommend it to others (96%). Participants appreciated the confidentiality of the chatbot, the conversational prompts and offered suggestions to make the chatbot more accessible and user-friendly. Most participants (92%) reported that they learned new information about HIV from the chatbot.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540121.2025.2470318

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mathur et al. (2025) co-developed a PrEP information chatbot with providers and community representatives and revised its language about sexual partners so that it would not stigmatize transgender men.

    “Mathur et al. (2025) co-developed a PrEP information chatbot with providers and community representatives and revised its language about sexual partners so that it would not stigmatize transgender men.”
  • Among the 150 clinic attendees who used the chatbot, transgender men described it as safer than speaking to staff precisely because a chatbot could not judge them.

    “Among the 150 clinic attendees who used it, transgender men described it as safer than speaking to staff precisely because a chatbot could not judge them.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000511 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000974 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/jia2.26154 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.015 · DOI
  5. 10.1186/s12978-019-0767-9 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s11904-008-0028-y · DOI
  7. 10.1037//0278-6133.13.3.238 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30039-X · DOI
  10. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000647 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/jia2.25653 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.07.001 · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0246717 · DOI
  14. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31827e622d · DOI
  15. 10.2196/38635 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/20552076231219117 · DOI
  17. 10.31899/pgy12.1036 · DOI
  18. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002585 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/s12889-022-14236-z · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102098 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002436 · DOI
  22. 10.2196/35573 · DOI
  23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0196280 · DOI
  24. 10.3389/fped.2023.1132639 · DOI
  25. 10.31899/hiv13.1016 · DOI
  26. 10.1080/17441692.2020.1849351 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00444 · DOI
  29. 10.2196/17158 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1002/jia2.25933 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.07.118 · DOI
  32. 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00721 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mathur, S., Eromhonsele, A. F., Vallarino, Z., Savel, C., Oche, E., Ononye, O., Shoyemi, E., & Tun, W.
Affiliations
  • Population Council
  • Centre for Population Health Initiatives
Venue
AIDS Care
Published
2025-02-27
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1015-1025
ISSN
  • 0954-0121
  • 1360-0451
Cited by
9
References
1
Language
en
Funders
Gilead Sciences (IN-US-412-6437)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review