The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sexual violence in contemporary educational contexts
Open accessAbstract
As we write this introduction in early 2022, this themed issue provides us with the opportunity to reflect on the intersection of education and sexual violence. Although educational institutions – ...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Schools are institutional settings in which harmful gender norms and gender-based and sexual violence occur and can be resisted through active engagement of key stakeholders.
“Schools are institutional settings in which harmful gender norms and gender-based and sexual violence occur and can be resisted through active engagement of key stakeholders (Mendes, Horeck, and Ringrose 2022), including teachers, students and administrators.”
From Technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration as a tool for gender policing in secondary schools (2026) · cites this paper as Mendes, Horeck, and Ringrose 2022
In “Sexual violence in contemporary educational contexts” (page unavailable), the paper describes gender and sexual violence as routine in educational spaces and says educational institutions must combat it from within. It also reports students’ and activists’ calls for better education and describes naming violence as a way to challenge it. It does not specifically establish that resistance occurs through active engagement of key stakeholders as a group. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Ahmed Sara., 2021, Complaint!
- Horeck T., 2021, The Palgrave Handbook of Gendered Violence and Technology
- 10.1007/978-3-319-98669-2 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Almanssori, S., Paskaran, L., & Mendes, K. (2026) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2025.2531789 · Cited by 5
“Schools are institutional settings in which harmful gender norms and gender-based and sexual violence occur and can be resisted through active engagement of key stakeholders (Mendes, Horeck, and Ringrose 2022), including teachers, students and administrators.”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendes, K., Horeck, T., & Ringrose, J.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ringrose, Jessica
- Venue
- Gender and Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-02-17
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-133
- ISSN
- 0954-0253 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0516
- OpenAlex
- W4220772573
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Gender and Education (publishedVersion)
- Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
- Keywords
- sexual violence, educational institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
