Cited by 645Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesCognitive Functions and Memory

A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning

Schretlen, David J., Shapiro, Anne M.·2003·International Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

Changes in cognitive functioning often result from traumatic brain injury (TBI) and predict other important aspects of psychosocial recovery. Despite this pivotal role, no quantitative review of cognitive functioning across the spectrum of TBI severity has been reported. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis of 39 mostly cross-sectional studies of the cognitive effects of mild head injury (MHI) and moderate-severe TBI from the acute phase through long-term follow-up. The studies reported 48 comparisons of patients (n = 1716) and control subjects (n = 1164). Averaged across all follow-up periods, the effect of moderate-severe TBI (weighted mean Cohen's d = -0.74) was more than three times the effect of MHI (weighted mean d = -0.24) on overall cognitive functioning. Further, the natural logarithm of the follow-up interval correlated very strongly with estimates of d among patients with MHI, but less so among those with moderate-severe TBI. In short, findings from published research suggest that overall cognitive functioning recovers most rapidly during the first few weeks following MHI, and essentially returns to baseline within 1-3 months. Cognitive functioning also improves during the first two years after moderate-severe TBI, but remains markedly impaired even among patients tested > 2 years post-injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540260310001606728

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 645

Authors
Schretlen, D. J., & Shapiro, A. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, Anne M.
Venue
International Review of Psychiatry
Published
2003-11
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
341-349
ISSN
  • 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1627
OpenAlex
W2136302159
Cited by
645
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 46
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Academy of Neurology
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH043775, R01MH060504, R01 MH43775-12, R01 MH60504-07)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS38927, R01NS038927)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, cognitive function, mild traumatic brain injury, moderate to severe TBI, TBI severity, cognitive recovery, long-term cognitive impairment, follow-up interval, psychosocial recovery
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review