Cited by 36Innovations in Medical EducationPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and Supervision

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychotherapy training for psychiatrists: UK and global perspectives

Holmes, Jeremy, Mizen, Susan, Jacobs, Caroline·2007·International Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

Psychotherapy training for psychiatrists has often been honoured more in the breach than the observance. While most training schemes pay lip service to psychotherapy, few provide the comprehensive training to which national and international bodies aspire. Recent educational changes, especially the move from course completion to competency evaluation, and the implementation of 'requirements' as opposed to 'recommendations', provide an opportunity for psychotherapy to become more central to psychiatric training. Based on international systematic enquiry and specific experience in the UK, this article makes a number of theoretical and practical suggestions: (a) mentalization as a relevant indicator of psychological mindedness for trainees and ways in which it might be measured (b) the importance of identifying the small number of trainees at risk for dangerous practice and remedial measures (c) the importance of local and national leadership if change is to be initiated and followed through over a number of years (d) ways in which the paradox of underdevelopment of psychotherapy training can be overcome via the reinforcement of existing expertise and values as well as the use of visiting 'experts' and modern IT aids.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540260601080888

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Allen J, 2006, Handbook of Mentalisation
  2. Department of Health, 2004, Organising and delivering psychological therapies
  3. Freud S, 1937, Standard Edition, 23
  4. Holmes J, 2006, Handbook of mentalisation
  5. Mitchison S, 2006, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 12, 59
  6. World Health Organisation (WHO) and World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2005, Atlas: Psychiatric education and training across the world

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Holmes, J., Mizen, S., & Jacobs, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Devon Partnership NHS Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Holmes, Jeremy
Venue
International Review of Psychiatry
Published
2007-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
93-100
ISSN
  • 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1627
OpenAlex
W2049067751
Cited by
36
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
Keywords
psychotherapy training, psychiatric training, competency-based training, mentalization, psychological mindedness, cross-national comparison
MeSH terms
Cross-Cultural Comparison, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Continuing, United Kingdom, Humans, Internship and Residency, Psychiatry, Psychoanalytic Therapy, Psychotherapy, Personal Construct Theory, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review