Cited by 259Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social media use and depression in adolescents: a scoping review

Open access
Vidal, Carol, Lhaksampa, Tenzin, Miller, Leslie, Platt, Rheanna·2020·International Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

There have been increases in adolescent depression and suicidal behaviour over the last two decades that coincide with the advent of social media (SM) (platforms that allow communication via digital media), which is widely used among adolescents. This scoping review examined the bi-directional association between the use of SM, specifically social networking sites (SNS), and depression and suicidality among adolescents. The studies reviewed yielded four main themes in SM use through thematic analysis: quantity of SM use, quality of SM use, social aspects associated with SM use, and disclosure of mental health symptoms. Research in this field would benefit from use of longitudinal designs, objective and timely measures of SM use, research on the mechanisms of the association between SM use and depression and suicidality, and research in clinical populations to inform clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540261.2020.1720623

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pantic I., 2012, Psychiatria Danubina, 24, 90

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–256 of 256

Metadata

Authors
Vidal, C., Lhaksampa, T., Miller, L., & Platt, R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Vidal, Carol
Venue
International Review of Psychiatry
Published
2020-02-17
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
235-253
ISSN
  • 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1627
OpenAlex
W3008073110
Cited by
259
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH118431)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
social media use, adolescent depression, suicidality, social networking sites, adolescents, mental health disclosure
MeSH terms
Online Social Networking, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Depression, Humans, Suicide, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review