Post-migration living difficulties, discrimination, and mental health of traumatized refugees in Germany: data from the refuKey project for timely and need-adapted treatment in a stepped-care setting
Abstract
Asylum seekers and refugees (ASR) experience many short-term and long-term post-migration stressors, e.g. discrimination after resettlement, leading to increased psychiatric morbidity in this population. Using data from the state-funded stepped-care project refuKey based in Lower Saxony, Germany, that aims to provide better mental health care access for ASR, we investigated the relationship between post-migration stressors and mental health in treatment-seeking ASR. In our naturalistic multi-centric study we assessed mental health (e.g. symptoms of depression, anxiety, traumatization, etc.), post-migration living difficulties, and perceived discrimination in ASR before and after treatment using questionnaires in eight languages consisting of internationally validated scales. Participants displayed poor mental health before, and significantly improved mental health parameters after treatment (p < 0.001). Post-migration living difficulties and perceived discrimination significantly predicted all mental health outcomes before treatment (p < 0.001) but not the treatment effects. However, perceived discrimination only contributed significantly to the prediction of quality-of-life and traumatization. Our findings suggest that refuKey-treatment helps despite the presence of post-migration living difficulties. Asylum policies should aim at reducing and overcoming post-migration living difficulties due to the strong association to mental health levels in treatment-seeking ASR.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Postmigration living difficulties and other contextual factors shape the types of common problems refugees face and need to be considered when developing interventions to address mental health issues in refugees.
“Postmigration living difficulties and other contextual factors further shape the types of common problems that refugees face [8,9] and need to be considered when developing interventions do address mental health issues in refugees.”
From Effects of a self-guided digital mental health self-help intervention for Syrian refugees in Egypt: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Graef-Calliess, I. T., Erdmann, L., Mohwinkel, V., Özkan, I., Finkelstein, D., Loos, K., Penteker, G., & Trilesnik, B.
- Affiliations
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Life - Institute for Mental Health, Rosdorf, Germany
- NTFN e.V, Hannover, Germany
- Corresponding author
- Graef-Calliess, Iris Tatjana
- Venue
- International Review of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2023-02-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 339-351
- ISSN
- 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-1627
- OpenAlex
- W4319962688
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- asylum seekers, refugees, post-migration living difficulties, perceived discrimination, mental health, trauma, depression, anxiety, quality of life, asylum policy, resettlement
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Germany, Humans, Mental Health, Refugees, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review