Cited by 9Migration, Health and TraumaMental Health Treatment and AccessMigration, Refugees, and Integration

Post-migration living difficulties, discrimination, and mental health of traumatized refugees in Germany: data from the refuKey project for timely and need-adapted treatment in a stepped-care setting

Graef-Calliess, Iris Tatjana, Erdmann, Lena, Mohwinkel, Vera, Özkan, Ibrahim, Finkelstein, Daniela, Loos, Karin, Penteker, Gisela, Trilesnik, Beata·2023·International Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

Asylum seekers and refugees (ASR) experience many short-term and long-term post-migration stressors, e.g. discrimination after resettlement, leading to increased psychiatric morbidity in this population. Using data from the state-funded stepped-care project refuKey based in Lower Saxony, Germany, that aims to provide better mental health care access for ASR, we investigated the relationship between post-migration stressors and mental health in treatment-seeking ASR. In our naturalistic multi-centric study we assessed mental health (e.g. symptoms of depression, anxiety, traumatization, etc.), post-migration living difficulties, and perceived discrimination in ASR before and after treatment using questionnaires in eight languages consisting of internationally validated scales. Participants displayed poor mental health before, and significantly improved mental health parameters after treatment (p < 0.001). Post-migration living difficulties and perceived discrimination significantly predicted all mental health outcomes before treatment (p < 0.001) but not the treatment effects. However, perceived discrimination only contributed significantly to the prediction of quality-of-life and traumatization. Our findings suggest that refuKey-treatment helps despite the presence of post-migration living difficulties. Asylum policies should aim at reducing and overcoming post-migration living difficulties due to the strong association to mental health levels in treatment-seeking ASR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09540261.2022.2164181

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 9

Authors
Graef-Calliess, I. T., Erdmann, L., Mohwinkel, V., Özkan, I., Finkelstein, D., Loos, K., Penteker, G., & Trilesnik, B.
Affiliations
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Life - Institute for Mental Health, Rosdorf, Germany
  • NTFN e.V, Hannover, Germany
Corresponding author
Graef-Calliess, Iris Tatjana
Venue
International Review of Psychiatry
Published
2023-02-10
Volume
35
Issue
3-4
Pages
339-351
ISSN
  • 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1627
OpenAlex
W4319962688
Cited by
9
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
asylum seekers, refugees, post-migration living difficulties, perceived discrimination, mental health, trauma, depression, anxiety, quality of life, asylum policy, resettlement
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Germany, Humans, Mental Health, Refugees, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review