Testing the testing effect in the classroom
Abstract
Laboratory studies show that taking a test on studied material promotes subsequent learning and retention of that material on a final test (termed the testing effect). Educational research has virtually ignored testing as a technique to improve classroom learning. We investigated the testing effect in a college course. Students took weekly quizzes followed by multiple choice criterial tests (unit tests and a cumulative final). Weekly quizzes included multiple choice or short answer questions, after which feedback was provided. As an exposure control, in some weeks students were presented target material for additional reading. Quizzing, but not additional reading, improved performance on the criterial tests relative to material not targeted by quizzes. Further, short answer quizzes produced more robust benefits than multiple choice quizzes. This pattern converges with laboratory findings showing that recall tests are more beneficial than recognition tests for subsequent memory performance. We conclude that in the classroom testing can be used to promote learning, not just to evaluate learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When material has been previously studied, taking an MCQ test followed by feedback yields comparable final test performance to restudying.
“When material has been previously studied, taking an MCQ test followed by feedback has been found to yield comparable final test performance to restudying (e.g.Butler & Roediger, 2007; S. H. K. Kang, McDermott, & Roediger, 2007;McDaniel, Anderson, Derbish, & Morisette, 2007).”
From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as McDaniel, Anderson, Derbish, & Morisette, 2007
Using production tests in the classroom will promote better retention than recognition tests.
“This study and others indicate that using production tests in the classroom will promote better retention than recognition tests.23,24”
From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [24]
At least one study showing the benefits of testing occurred in a university course.
“However, at least one study showing the benefits of testing occurred in a university course.24”
From Test-enhanced learning in medical education (2008) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 563
- Authors
- McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Corresponding author
- McDaniel, Mark A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 494-513
- ISSN
- 0954-1446 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0635
- OpenAlex
- W2159480120
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 8.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- testing effect, classroom quizzes, multiple-choice quizzes, memory retention, recall versus recognition, feedback, university students, learning promotion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review