Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Process performance measurement system: A tool to support process-based organizations

Kueng, Peter·2000·Total Quality Management

Abstract

In order to gain long-term competitive advantages many companies are focusing on business processes wherein functional organizations are replaced by process organizations. In this paper, it is argued that improvement of business processes, radically or stepwise, is essential and should be supported by a holistic process performance measurement system (PPMS). Based on the literature and practical experience - gained through a 2-year project with four enterprises - a framework for conceptualizing and developing a PPMS is presented and lessons learned are outlined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0954412007035

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Kueng, P.
Venue
Total Quality Management
Published
2000-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
67-85
ISSN
  • 0954-4127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0613
OpenAlex
W2064908733
Cited by
293
References
2
FWCI
15.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Process performance measurement system: A tool to support process-based organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0954412007035
The paper
Kueng, P. (2000). Process performance measurement system: A tool to support process-based organizations. Total Quality Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412007035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.