Cited by 90Psoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisDermatology and Skin DiseasesSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real-world practice indirect comparison between guselkumab, risankizumab, and tildrakizumab: results from an Italian 28-week retrospective study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab, acting on interleukin(IL)23 axis, have been recently approved for psoriasis management. However, real-life data regarding their comparison are scant. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our real life study was to perform an indirect efficacy and safety comparison among anti-IL23s, particularly focusing on difficult-to-treat areas. METHODS: A 2-year single-center retrospective observational study was performed enrolling moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients treated with anti-IL23. For each patient, clinical and demographical data were collected at baseline and at week4, week16, and week28. PASI, BSA, NAPSI, and specific BSA regarding difficult to treat areas were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients were included in the study: 63 (42%) received guselkumab, 21 (14%) tildrakizumab, and 66 (44%) risankizumab. The three groups were comparable for age, sex, and disease severity, only differing for psoriasis duration, psoriatic arthritis prevalence (higher in guselkumab), and previous systemic treatment failure (lower for tildrakizumab). Mean PASI and BSA significantly reduced from baseline up to week 28 without significant differences among the 3 drugs (reduction of 95-97.3% for PASI and 94.8-96.7% for BSA). No significant differences were registered for PASI75, 90, or 100 responses, in particular, PASI100 was reached by 73.4-85% of patients. As regards difficult-to-treat areas, all the drugs displayed a high efficacy, with significant differences registered only for the rapidity of action on palmoplantar psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS: Our 28-weeks study demonstrated a comparable efficacy and safety profile for all anti-IL23, with guselkumab and risankizumab appearing slightly faster than tildrakizumab particularly on palmoplantar lesions in the short-term.What is already known about this topic?The interleukins (IL) 23/17 axis seems to play a key role in psoriasis management.Guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab, selectively blocking the IL23 signaling, have been recently approved for psoriasis management.Real-world data regarding different anti-IL23 comparisons are scant.What does this study add?Our 28-weeks study showed that there were not any significant differences in terms of efficacy and safety between each anti-IL-23 apart from palmoplantar area where guselkumab and risankizumab showed higher efficacy.Globally risankizumab and guselkumab appeared slightly faster than tildrakizumab.Guselkumab, tildrakizumab, and risankizumab are valid weapons for psoriasis management, also for difficult-to-treat areas (scalp, nails, genitalia, lower limbs, and palmo-plantar area).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09546634.2022.2081655

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Megna M, Fabbrocini G, Ruggiero A, et al. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in psoriasis patients who failed anti-IL-17, anti-12/23and/or anti IL-23: preliminary data of a real-life 16-week retrospective study. Dermatol Ther. 2020;5:e14144.
  2. Tildrakizumab for psoriasis. Aust Prescr. 2019;42(1):40–41.
  3. Ruggiero A, Fabbrocini G, Cinelli E, et al. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis patients who failed ustekinumab and/or anti-interleukin-17 treatment: a real-life 52-week retrospective study. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(1):e14673.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 90

Metadata

Authors
Megna, M., Tommasino, N., Potestio, L., Battista, T., Ruggiero, A., Noto, M., Fabbrocini, G., & Genco, L.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Megna, Matteo
Venue
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Published
2022-05-29
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
2813-2820
ISSN
  • 0954-6634 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1753
OpenAlex
W4281288090
Cited by
90
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 13
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dermatological Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Keywords
psoriasis, guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab, indirect comparison, real-world effectiveness, PASI response, palmoplantar psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, drug safety, biologic therapy, Italian patients
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Interleukins, Psoriasis, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Interleukin-23, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review