The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tumour and Normal Tissue Responses to Fractionated Non-uniform Dose Delivery
Abstract
The dose-volume response of tumours and normal tissues is discussed in terms of 'parallelity' and 'seriality'. The volume dependence of the radiation response of a tumour depends primarily on the eradication of all its clonogenic cells and the tumour has a parallel organization. The response of heterogeneous tumours is examined, and it is shown that a small resistant clonogen population may cause a low dose-response gradient, gamma. Injury to normal tissue is a much more complex and gradual process. It depends on earlier effects induced long before depletion of stem cells or differentiated cells that in addition may have a complex structural and functional organization. The volume dependence of the dose-response relation of normal tissues is therefore described here by a new parameter, the 'relative seriality', s, of the infrastructure of the organ. The model is compared with clinical and experimental data on normal tissue response, and shows good agreement both with regard to the shape of dose-response relation and the volume dependence of the isoeffect dose. For example, the spinal cord has a high and the lung a low 'relative seriality', which is reasonable with regard to the organization of these tissues. The response of tumours and normal tissues to non-uniform dose delivery is quantified for fractionated therapy using the linear quadratic cell survival parameters alpha and beta. The steepness, gamma, and the 50% response dose, D50, of the dose-response relationship are derived both for a constant dose per fraction and a constant number of dose fractions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bragg-peak proton-beam therapy for arteriovenous malformations of the brain
Kjellberg, R. N., Hanamura, T., Davis, K. R., Lyons, S. L., & Adams, R. D. (1983) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198308043090503 · Cited by 540
Cited by
Stewart, F. A., Akleyev, A. V., Hauer-Jensen, M., Hendry, J. H., Kleiman, N. J., MacVittie, T. J., Aleman, B. M., Edgar, A. B., Mabuchi, K., Muirhead, C. R., et al. (2012) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001 · Cited by 1,604
Bentzen, S. M., Constine, L. S., Deasy, J. O., Eisbruch, A., Jackson, A., Marks, L. B., Ten Haken, R. K., & Yorke, E. D. (2010) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040 · Cited by 1,257
Metadata
- Authors
- Källman, P., Ågren, A., & Brahme, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 249-262
- ISSN
- 0955-3002 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3095
- OpenAlex
- W1975292370
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumour and Normal Tissue Responses to Fractionated Non-uniform Dose Delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09553009214552071
- The paper
- Källman, P., Ågren, A., & Brahme, A. (1992). Tumour and Normal Tissue Responses to Fractionated Non-uniform Dose Delivery. International Journal of Radiation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553009214552071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.