The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Single-cell Gel Electrophoresis Applied to the Analysis of UV-C Damage and Its Repair in Human Cells
Abstract
DNA breaks in eukaryotic cells can be detected by alkaline electrophoresis of cells embedded in agarose. DNA containing breaks extends in the direction of the anode forming an image resembling the tail of a comet. We have adapted this procedure of single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) for studying DNA damage and repair induced by UV-C-radiation, using HeLa cells. UV-C itself does not induce DNA breakage, and though cellular repair of UV-C damage produces DNA breaks as intermediates, these are too short-lived to be detected by SCGE. Incubation of UV-C-irradiated cells with the DNA synthesis inhibitor aphidicolin causes accumulation of incomplete repair sites to a level readily detected by SCGE even after doses as low as 0.5 J m-2 and incubation for as little as 5 min. We have also used SCGE to study UV-C-dependent incision, repair synthesis and ligation in permeable cells. Finally, we have incubated permeable cells, after UV-C-irradiation, with exogenous UV endonuclease, examining the consequent breaks both by SCGE and by alkaline unwinding in order to express results of the electrophoretic method in terms of DNA break frequencies. The sensitivity of the SCGE technique can thus be estimated; as few as 0.1 DNA breaks per 10(9) daltons are detected.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing
Tice, R. R., Agurell, E., Anderson, D., Burlinson, B., Hartmann, A., Kobayashi, H., Miyamae, Y., Rojas, E., Ryu, J.-C., & Sasaki, Y. F. (2000) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2280(2000)35:3<206::aid-em8>3.0.co;2-j · Cited by 4,860
The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations
Collins, A. R. (2004) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1385/mb:26:3:249 · Cited by 2,892
Self-citationThe single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): A European review
McKelvey-Martin, V. J., Green, M. H. L., Schmezer, P., Pool-Zobel, B. L., De Méo, M. P., & Collins, A. (1993) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/0027-5107(93)90207-v · Cited by 892
Self-citationThe comet assay: what can it really tell us?
Collins, A. R., Dobson, V. L., Dušinská, M., Kennedy, G., & Štětina, R. (1997) · Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/s0027-5107(97)00013-4 · Cited by 668
Self-citationThe comet assay: A sensitive method for detecting DNA damage in individual cells
Liao, W., McNutt, M. A., & Zhu, W.-G. (2009) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.02.016 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Gedik, C. M., Ewen, S. W. B., & Collins, A. R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 313-320
- ISSN
- 0955-3002 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3095
- OpenAlex
- W2034562422
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Single-cell Gel Electrophoresis Applied to the Analysis of UV-C Damage and Its Repair in Human Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09553009214552161
- The paper
- Gedik, C. M., Ewen, S. W. B., & Collins, A. R. (1992). Single-cell Gel Electrophoresis Applied to the Analysis of UV-C Damage and Its Repair in Human Cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553009214552161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.