The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Correlation between cellular radiosensitivity and non-repaired double-strand breaks studied in nine mammalian cell lines
Abstract
PURPOSE: To test the relationship between cell killing and non-repaired DNA strand breaks both in repair proficient and deficient cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five of the cell lines used are repair competent (CHO, CHO K1, rat rhabdomyosarcoma R1H, mouse balb and normal human fibroblasts), while four display a reduced repair capacity (scid, xrs1, xrs5, AT). Cell survival was determined by colony formation assay. The total number of strand breaks was measured by the alkaline unwinding technique and the numbers of double-strand breaks by constant-field gel electrophoresis. RESULTS: The nine cell lines showed a broad spectrum in radiosensitivity with SF2 values ranging from 0.018 to 0.58. The cell lines did not vary in the number of induced strand breaks, neither for all strand breaks nor for double-strand breaks alone. In contrast, there was a large variation in the number of non-repaired strand breaks measured 24 h after irradiation. Comparison of cell killing with the number of non-repaired breaks measured after a dose of 90 Gy showed no correlation for single-strand breaks (r2=0.29) but a fairly good correlation for double-strand breaks (r2=0.87). This correlation was found to hold both for repair proficient and deficient cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained strongly suggest that the number of non-repaired double-strand breaks measured 24h after irradiation can be used as an indicator of cellular radiosensitivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Double-Strand Break Repair Defect in ATM-Deficient Cells Contributes to Radiosensitivity
Kühne, M., Riballo, E., Rief, N., Rothkamm, K., Jeggo, P. A., & Löbrich, M. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-2384 · Cited by 347
The Role of DNA Single- and Double-Strand Breaks in Cell Killing by Ionizing Radiation
Olive, P. L. (1998) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3579807 · Cited by 345
Banáth, J. P., MacPhail, S. H., & Olive, P. L. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-1433 · Cited by 340
Phosphorylation of histone H2AX as a measure of radiosensitivity
Olive, P. L., & Banáth, J. P. (2004) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.028 · Cited by 279
Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure
Sridharan, D. M., Asaithamby, A., Blattnig, S. R., Costes, S. V., Doetsch, P. W., Dynan, W. S., Hahnfeldt, P., Hlatky, L., Kidane, Y., Kronenberg, A., et al. (2016) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2016.05.004 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- DIKOMEY J. DAHM-DAPHI I. BRAMMER R., E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 269-278
- ISSN
- 0955-3002 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-3095
- OpenAlex
- W2166663643
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Correlation between cellular radiosensitivity and non-repaired double-strand breaks studied in nine mammalian cell lines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/095530098142365
- The paper
- DIKOMEY J. DAHM-DAPHI I. BRAMMER R., E. (1998). Correlation between cellular radiosensitivity and non-repaired double-strand breaks studied in nine mammalian cell lines. International Journal of Radiation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/095530098142365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.