Cited by 2Arabic Language Education StudiesText Readability and SimplificationSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Text classification and gradation in Arabic textbooks

Open access
Mohamed, Salwa·2024·The Language Learning Journal

Abstract

Text classification and text gradation are important for language teachers. Profiling and readability studies examine textual and linguistic features that determine text difficulty. Arabic, as an under-resourced language, suffers from a lack of such studies which results in material developers and textbook writers relying on their intuitions and experiences in selecting appropriate texts. At the classroom level, teachers often supplement or adapt the texts they use to suit their students’ developmental stages. However, they often do this based on their intuition and experience as well. This study aims to sensitise material developers and particularly teachers to a range of textual, linguistic and contextual features that affect text difficulty so, they can make informed decisions about the suitability of the texts they use and how to adapt and/or supplement them. Although this is most important for teachers of under-resourced languages such as Arabic; the study will be useful for teachers of resource-rich languages as well since research shows that even with systematically classified texts, discrepancies exist between texts and their assumed level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09571736.2023.2213695

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Alderson J. Charles N. Figueras H. Kuijper G. Nold S. Takala and C. Tardieu. 2004. The development of specifications for item development and classification within the common European framework of reference for languages: learning teaching assessment: final report of the Dutch CEF construct project. Paper presented at workshop on research into and with the CEFR University of Amsterdam.
  2. Alosh, M. 2010b. Ahlan wa Sahlan: Functional Modern Standard Arabic for Beginners. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  3. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages [ACTFL]. 2012. ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. 3rd ed. Alexandria: ACTFL INC.
  4. Brustad, K., M. Al-Batal, and A. Al-Tonsi. 2004b. Al-Kitaab fii taallum al-arabiyya: A Text for Arabic, Part 1. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  5. Brustad, K., M. Al-Batal, and A. Al-Tonsi. 2006. Al-Kitaab fii taallum al-arabiyya: A Text for Arabic, Part 2. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  6. Brustad, K., M. Al-Batal, and A. Al-Tonsi. 2007. Al-Kitaab fii taallum al-arabiyya: A Text for Arabic, Part 3. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  7. Cambridge University. 2018. How Long Does It Take to Learn a Foreign Language? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Francois T. and C. Fairon. 2012. An AI readability formula for French as a foreign language. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning Jeju Island Korea 12–14 July 466–477.
  10. Pilan I. 2013. NLP-based approaches to sentence readability for second language learning purposes. Master’s dissertation Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg. file:///C:/Users/55096616/Downloads/NLP_based_Approaches_to_Sentence_Readabi.pdf.
  11. Pilan I. and E. Volodina. 2018. Investigating the importance of linguistic complexity features across different datasets related to language learning. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Linguistic Complexity and Natural Language Processing Santa Fe New Mexico USA 49–58.
  12. Pilan I. E. Volodina and T. Zesch. 2016. Predicting proficiency levels in learner writings by transferring a linguistic complexity model from expert-written coursebooks. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics 2101–2111.
  13. Renandya, W. A. 2015. Reading in a foreign language: what else is important besides skills and strategies? In Developing Indegenous Models of English Language Teaching and Assessment, eds. F. A. Hamied, I. B. P. Yadnya, and I. G. A. G. Sociowati, 81–94. Bali, Indonesia: Udayana University Press.
  14. Salamoura, A., and N. Saville. 2010. Exemplifying the CEFR: criterial features of written learner English from the English profile programme. In Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections Between SLA and Language Testing Research, eds. I. Bartning, M. Martin, and I. Vedder, 101–132. European Second Language Association. www.lulu.com.
  15. Uchida S. and M. Negishi. 2018. Assigning CEFR-J Levels to English Texts Based on Textual Features. In Fourth Asia Pacific Corpus Linguistics Conference (APCLC 2018) Takamatsu: Japan 463–467.
  16. Younes, M., and Y. Chami. 2014. Arabiyyat Al-Naas Part Two. New York: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 2

Metadata

Authors
Mohamed, S.
Affiliations
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
Corresponding author
Mohamed, Salwa
Venue
The Language Learning Journal
Published
2023-05-26
Volume
52
Issue
6
Pages
629-649
ISSN
  • 0957-1736 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-2167
OpenAlex
W4378472039
Cited by
2
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Language Learning Journal (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Arabic Language Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Text Readability and Simplification
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
text classification, Arabic language textbooks, text complexity, readability, low-resource languages, textbook adaptation, language teaching materials, Arabic language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review