The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms
Open accessAbstract
Drawing on the business case for gender diversity, this article examines whether board gender diversity has a positive effect on firm performance, based on evidence from the Netherlands and Denmark. We use empirical data on 186 listed firms observed in 2007. Almost 40% have at least one woman in the boardroom. Within boards, the average share of women is only 5.4%. To investigate the impact of board gender diversity, two-stage least-squares estimation is applied, using Tobin’s Q as a measure of performance. Our findings indicate that on the basis of this data-set, there is no relation between board diversity and firm performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems
JENSEN, M. C. (1993) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x · Cited by 8,528
The Modern Corporation and Private Property
Kline, J. V., Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1933) · Columbia Law Review · doi:10.2307/1115736 · Cited by 7,361
Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors
Yermack, D. (1996) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(95)00844-5 · Cited by 6,603
Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007 · Cited by 5,711
Gender Differences in Preferences
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448 · Cited by 5,694
Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367 · Cited by 3,723
Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003) · Financial Review · doi:10.1111/1540-6288.00034 · Cited by 3,353
(2019) · Eastern Economic Journal · doi:10.1057/41302.1939-4632 · Cited by 2,707
Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature
Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (2001) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w8161 · Cited by 2,498
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2 · Cited by 2,236
Metadata
- Authors
- Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-09-28
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1777-1790
- ISSN
- 0958-5192 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4399
- OpenAlex
- W2164740362
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 32.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09585192.2015.1079229
- The paper
- Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., & Remery, C. (2016). Gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1079229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.