The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flipped classroom in English language teaching: a systematic review
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the trends and main findings of the studies concerning the flipped classroom method in the field of English language teaching (ELT). For this purpose, databases including Web of Science, Eric, Taylor & Francis and the Educational full text EBSCO were reviewed, and a total of 43 articles were analysed. Systematic review was used as the research methodology. The articles were analysed utilising a content analysis method. The findings of the study revealed that the flipped classroom method in ELT gained popularity among researchers after 2014, and the number of the studies in the field rapidly increased in the last two years (2016–2017). In addition, the most commonly used research methods in flipped classroom in ELT studies were found to be mixed and quantitative methods. In the examined studies, speaking and writing abilities were the most commonly studied language skills. Further analysis revealed challenges, as well as benefits related to the use of the flipped classroom method in English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom. Additionally, in studies reviewed concerning the effectiveness of the flipped classroom methods, the findings mostly pointed to the benefits of the flipped classroom method. On the basis of the review, various suggestions are made for practitioners and future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700 · Cited by 17,648
The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002 · Cited by 2,152
Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis
Wu, W.-H., Jim Wu, Y.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Kao, H.-Y., Lin, C.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.016 · Cited by 946 · cited 1×
“The review studies in the literature also indicate that in research into educational technologies the participants are generally chosen from university-level students (Kucuk et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2012).”
BackgroundA systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education
Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12548 · Cited by 581
Cited by
Hong, W. C. H. (2023) · Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation · doi:10.61414/jeti.v5i1.103 · Cited by 365
Teachers' Perceptions of Technology Integration in Teaching-Learning Practices: A Systematic Review
Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317 · Cited by 358
A systematic review of systematic reviews on blended learning: trends, gaps and future directions
Ashraf, M. A., Yang, M., Zhang, Y., Denden, M., Tlili, A., Liu, J., Huang, R., & Burgos, D. (2021) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s331741 · Cited by 187
Teo, T., Khazaie, S., & Derakhshan, A. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104406 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Turan, Z., & Akdag-Cimen, B.
- Venue
- Computer Assisted Language Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-02-26
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 590-606
- ISSN
- 0958-8221 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-3210
- OpenAlex
- W2915317332
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flipped classroom in English language teaching: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
- The paper
- Turan, Z., & Akdag-Cimen, B. (2020). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: a systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
