Cited by 91Emotional Labor in ProfessionsHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

Emotional labour, gender and professional stereotypes of emotional and physical contact, and personal perspectives on the emotional labour of nursing

Gray, Ben·2010·Journal of Gender Studies

Abstract

Emotions in health organisations tend to remain tacit and in need of clarification. Often, emotions are made invisible in nursing and reduced to part and parcel of ‘women's work’ in the domestic sphere. It has been argued that there is an emotional division of labour in nursing that is based upon gender and gender stereotypes. Opinions on appropriate and inappropriate emotions shape images of nursing, interpersonal and physical contact with patients, the perceived roles of male and female nurses, and the roles of other health staff such as doctors. The purpose of this exploratory qualitative study is to look at nurse narratives on emotional labour and explore the gendered nature of emotional labour. Data were collected primarily from 16 in-depth and semi-structured interviews with nurses. Divisions of gender and emotion will be analysed in the talk of nurse interviewees. Excerpts from interviews will be presented so as to look at views on the definition, stereotypes, gender and professional divisions of emotional labour. This is important in investigating the minutiae of nurses' emotional labour and its gendered nature, beginning to explore the potential therapeutic value of emotional labour and outlining the centrality of emotional labour in nursing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09589236.2010.514207

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For nurses and physiotherapists, relationships with colleagues are seen as a central job component requiring substantial commitment, dedication, and emotional engagement.

    “For nurses and physiotherapists, their relationships with their colleagues are seen as a central job component (Bonifas, 2015), one that requires a substantial level of commitment, dedication, and emotional engagement (Gray, 2010;Henderson, 2001).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 36 · Cited by 91

Authors
Gray, B.
Affiliations
Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
Corresponding author
Gray, Ben
Venue
Journal of Gender Studies
Published
2010-12
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
349-360
ISSN
  • 0958-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3869
OpenAlex
W2045058692
Cited by
91
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
19.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Gender Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canterbury Christ Church University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
emotional labor, gender, occupational stereotypes, nursing, interpersonal contact, women's employment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review