Emotional labour, gender and professional stereotypes of emotional and physical contact, and personal perspectives on the emotional labour of nursing
Abstract
Emotions in health organisations tend to remain tacit and in need of clarification. Often, emotions are made invisible in nursing and reduced to part and parcel of ‘women's work’ in the domestic sphere. It has been argued that there is an emotional division of labour in nursing that is based upon gender and gender stereotypes. Opinions on appropriate and inappropriate emotions shape images of nursing, interpersonal and physical contact with patients, the perceived roles of male and female nurses, and the roles of other health staff such as doctors. The purpose of this exploratory qualitative study is to look at nurse narratives on emotional labour and explore the gendered nature of emotional labour. Data were collected primarily from 16 in-depth and semi-structured interviews with nurses. Divisions of gender and emotion will be analysed in the talk of nurse interviewees. Excerpts from interviews will be presented so as to look at views on the definition, stereotypes, gender and professional divisions of emotional labour. This is important in investigating the minutiae of nurses' emotional labour and its gendered nature, beginning to explore the potential therapeutic value of emotional labour and outlining the centrality of emotional labour in nursing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For nurses and physiotherapists, relationships with colleagues are seen as a central job component requiring substantial commitment, dedication, and emotional engagement.
“For nurses and physiotherapists, their relationships with their colleagues are seen as a central job component (Bonifas, 2015), one that requires a substantial level of commitment, dedication, and emotional engagement (Gray, 2010;Henderson, 2001).”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Gray, 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 36 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Gray, B.
- Affiliations
- Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gray, Ben
- Venue
- Journal of Gender Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-360
- ISSN
- 0958-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3869
- OpenAlex
- W2045058692
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 19.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Gender Studies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canterbury Christ Church University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Emotional Labor in Professions
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Keywords
- emotional labor, gender, occupational stereotypes, nursing, interpersonal contact, women's employment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review