Cited by 101Gender, Feminism, and MediaGender, Sexuality, and EducationStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

‘If a girl’s photo gets sent around, that’s a way bigger deal than if a guy’s photo gets sent around’: gender, sexting, and the teenage years

Open access
Ricciardelli, Rosemary (Rose), Adorjan, Michael·2019·Journal of Gender Studies

Abstract

Youth, particularly female teens, are encouraged to self-monitor and be responsible for their actions online in order to avoid harm from cyberbullying, ‘sexting,’ and other forms of cyber-risk. Highlighting findings from 35 focus groups with Canadian teens regarding sexting, we show the continued saliency of a gendered double standard applied to the online distribution of nudes. Our sample of male and female teens (n = 115) from urban and rural regions, aged 13–19, underscores the relatively lower ‘stakes’ involved with sexting for male teens. We explore this trend with specific reference to the salience of hegemonic masculinities and the gendered aspects of public and private spaces, both online and offline. Public exposure of nudes has potentially serious stigmatizing consequences for youth. We highlight teen experiences sending and receiving images of male penises (‘dick pics’), which is an under-researched aspect of sexting. We show the relative ubiquity of receiving ‘dick pics’ among female teens, exploring various reactions, and male motivations for doing so from male and female standpoints. Policy implications are discussed with specific reference to school-based cyber-safety programs, which our participants indicate remain highly gendered, neglecting epistemological questions around male experiences and responsibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09589236.2018.1560245

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 101

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Connell, Robert William. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  2. Johnson, Matthew. 2015. Digital Literacy and Digital Citizenship: Approaches to Girls' Online Experiences. Pp. 339-360 in eGirls, eCitizens, edited by J. Bailey and V. Steeves. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
  3. Milford, Trevor. 2015. Revisiting cyberfeminism: Theory as a tool for understanding young women's experiences. In eGirls, eCitizens, edited by Jane Bailey and Valerie Steeves. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.

Authors
Ricciardelli, R. (., & Adorjan, M.
Affiliations
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Ricciardelli, Rosemary (Rose)
Venue
Journal of Gender Studies
Published
2018-12-27
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
563-577
ISSN
  • 0958-9236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3869
OpenAlex
W2908263183
Cited by
101
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5
FWCI
15.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Gender Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (cc-by)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430-2015-00157)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
sexting, adolescent girls, hegemonic masculinity, cyberbullying, cybersecurity risks, stigmatization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review