‘If a girl’s photo gets sent around, that’s a way bigger deal than if a guy’s photo gets sent around’: gender, sexting, and the teenage years
Open accessAbstract
Youth, particularly female teens, are encouraged to self-monitor and be responsible for their actions online in order to avoid harm from cyberbullying, ‘sexting,’ and other forms of cyber-risk. Highlighting findings from 35 focus groups with Canadian teens regarding sexting, we show the continued saliency of a gendered double standard applied to the online distribution of nudes. Our sample of male and female teens (n = 115) from urban and rural regions, aged 13–19, underscores the relatively lower ‘stakes’ involved with sexting for male teens. We explore this trend with specific reference to the salience of hegemonic masculinities and the gendered aspects of public and private spaces, both online and offline. Public exposure of nudes has potentially serious stigmatizing consequences for youth. We highlight teen experiences sending and receiving images of male penises (‘dick pics’), which is an under-researched aspect of sexting. We show the relative ubiquity of receiving ‘dick pics’ among female teens, exploring various reactions, and male motivations for doing so from male and female standpoints. Policy implications are discussed with specific reference to school-based cyber-safety programs, which our participants indicate remain highly gendered, neglecting epistemological questions around male experiences and responsibility.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The central shift in relational dynamics of youth sexting is the normalisation of the dick pic in social media ecosystems of young people.
“Now, a decade later, it appears that the central shift that has occurred in the relational dynamics of youth sexting is the normalisation of the dick pic in the social media ecosystems of young people (Ricciardelli & Adorjan, 2018).”
From Teen Girls’ Experiences Negotiating the Ubiquitous Dick Pic: Sexual Double Standards and the Normalization of Image Based Sexual Harassment (2021) · cites this paper as Ricciardelli & Adorjan, 2018
The Results and the section ‘Debating “Dick Pics”: Gendered Conceptions and Consequences’ describe sending and receiving dick pics as normalized and commonplace among the teens studied. The paper does not establish that this normalization was the central shift in youth sexting over the preceding decade; that temporal comparison is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe fallout of the non-consensual sharing and showing of nude images was described as worse for girls.
“Moreover, the fallout of the non-consensual sharing and showing of nude images was described as worse for girls, which aligns with previous research on how girls commonly face slut-shaming (Ringrose, Harvey, Gill, & Liv ingstone, 2013; Ringrose & Harvey, 2015; Ricciardelli & Adorjan, 2019) and victim-blaming (Mishna et al., 2021; Lippman & Campbell, 2014) and their images are”
From Young people's experiences of image-based sexual harassment and abuse in England and Canada: Toward a feminist framing of technologically facilitated sexual violence (2022) · cites this paper as Ricciardelli & Adorjan, 2019
Dick pics have become a ubiquitous part of youth digital sexual cultures.
“Our research confirms and extends earlier research that suggested dick pics have become a ubiquitous part of youth digital sexual cultures (Ricciardelli & Adorjan, 2018).”
From Teen Girls’ Experiences Negotiating the Ubiquitous Dick Pic: Sexual Double Standards and the Normalization of Image Based Sexual Harassment (2021) · cites this paper as Ricciardelli & Adorjan, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 101
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Connell, Robert William. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Johnson, Matthew. 2015. Digital Literacy and Digital Citizenship: Approaches to Girls' Online Experiences. Pp. 339-360 in eGirls, eCitizens, edited by J. Bailey and V. Steeves. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
- Milford, Trevor. 2015. Revisiting cyberfeminism: Theory as a tool for understanding young women's experiences. In eGirls, eCitizens, edited by Jane Bailey and Valerie Steeves. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
- Authors
- Ricciardelli, R. (., & Adorjan, M.
- Affiliations
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Ricciardelli, Rosemary (Rose)
- Venue
- Journal of Gender Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-12-27
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 563-577
- ISSN
- 0958-9236 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-3869
- OpenAlex
- W2908263183
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 15.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Gender Studies (publishedVersion)
- Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (430-2015-00157)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Keywords
- sexting, adolescent girls, hegemonic masculinity, cyberbullying, cybersecurity risks, stigmatization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review