Cited by 21Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsMarine and coastal plant biology

Spirulina platensis is more efficient than Chlorella homosphaera in carbohydrate productivity

Margarites, Ana Cláudia, Volpato, Noany, Araújo, Elenara, Cardoso, Luana Garbin, Bertolin, Telma Elita, Colla, Luciane Maria, Costa, Jorge Alberto Vieira·2017·Environmental Technology

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the production of biomass with high carbohydrate content by Spirulina platensis LEB 52 and Chlorella homosphaera microalgae. The cultivation of C. homosphaera and S. platensis LEB 52 was performed in standard medium diluted at 50%, and glucose was added as a source of organic carbon for mixotrophic metabolism. The sodium nitrate concentration was increased and the nitrogen components were reduced in the media to induce the synthesis of carbohydrates. C. homosphaera and S. platensis LEB 52 produced 16.32 and 116 mg L−1 of carbohydrates per day, respectively, when cultivated with 50% less nitrogen and 20% and 10% more sodium chloride, compared with the control. Glucose addition was an essential factor for microalgal growth, resulting in biomass increases of up to 2.79- and 3.45-fold for C. homosphaera and S. platensis LEB 52, respectively. Spirulina presented better characteristics than Chlorella with regard to the capacities of growth and carbohydrate synthesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09593330.2016.1254685

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 21

Authors
Margarites, A. C., Volpato, N., Araújo, E., Cardoso, L. G., Bertolin, T. E., Colla, L. M., & Costa, J. A. V.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR)
  • Universidade de Passo Fundo (BR)
  • Laboratory of Fermentations, Course of Food Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, University of Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil
Corresponding author
Colla, Luciane Maria
Venue
Environmental Technology
Published
2016-11-21
Volume
38
Issue
17
Pages
2209-2216
ISSN
  • 0959-3330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-487X
OpenAlex
W2540639272
Cited by
21
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
Keywords
Spirulina platensis, microalgae, carbohydrate production, biomass productivity, mixotrophic cultivation, glucose supplementation, nitrogen limitation, sodium nitrate, sodium chloride, microalgae growth
MeSH terms
Carbohydrates, Chlorella, Biomass, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Spirulina, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review