Cited by 61Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimization of biosurfactant production by Bacillus Subtilis N3-1P using the brewery waste as the carbon source

Moshtagh, Bahareh, Hawboldt, Kelly, Zhang, Baiyu·2019·Environmental Technology

Abstract

Biosurfactants are biologically produced by microorganisms and therefore biodegradable, making ideal substitutes to chemical surfactants for various applications. Large scale production of biosurfactants is limited because of the high cost. The production cost could be reduced by optimizing cultural conditions and using wastes as substrates. In this work, the response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis N3-1P strain using brewery waste as the sole carbon source. Five independent variables were varied; carbon and nitrogen concentration, agitation speed, temperature and initial pH. Surface tension and emulsification index were used to measure biosurfactant production. Results indicated that the ‘best’ surface tension and emulsification index were 27.31 mN m−1 and 63.11%, respectively, under optimized cultural conditions (7% (v v−1) brewery waste, 6.22 g L−1 ammonium nitrate, initial pH of 6.41, 150 rpm, and 27°C). The predicted responses were validated experimentally under the ‘optimum’ conditions, and 657 mg L−1 of biosurfactant was produced with a critical micelle concentration of 107 mg L−1.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09593330.2018.1473502

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Desai JD, 1997, Microbiol Mol Biol, 61, 47, 10.1128/.61.1.47-64.1997 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1186/2191-0855-1-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.06.009 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s12010-008-8155-x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.052 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2174/092986609787049358 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.06.039 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.003 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00059-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1007/s00253-001-0924-1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Maneerat S., 2005, Songklanakarin J Sci Techno, 27, 675
  13. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.02.044 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.procbio.2007.03.011 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.procbio.2008.04.013 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.03.050 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s11771-013-1578-8 · DOI
  18. 10.2298/CICEQ120518100R · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.bej.2015.05.001 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0922-338X(97)82784-5 · DOI
  21. 10.1590/S1517-83822004000100013 · DOI
  22. 10.4061/2011/653654 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1590/S0104-66322011000200001 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.07.001 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s00449-011-0674-0 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/ep.12013 · DOI
  27. Gudina EJ, 2015, Front Microbiol, 6, 1
  28. Khuri AI, 1996, Response surfaces: design and analyses
  29. Myers RH, 2002, Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments
  30. 10.1016/j.bej.2008.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.bej.2008.07.003 · DOI
  32. Ghribi D, 2011, Afr J Microbiol Res, 5, 4927
  33. 10.1007/s10295-009-0547-6 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.06.044 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/jobm.201100228 · DOI
  36. Hu X, 2015, Front Microbiol, 6, 1
  37. Kumar SS, 2015, J BioSci Biotechnol, 4, 123
  38. 10.1007/s12046-015-0451-x · DOI
  39. 10.15414/jmbfs.2016.5.6.578-583 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/10826068.2014.979204 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s002530050940 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s13765-013-3044-6 · DOI
  43. Jacques P, 1999, Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 77, 1, 10.1385/ABAB:77:1-3:223 · DOI
  44. 10.1186/s12934-017-0769-7 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/BF00250320 · DOI
  46. 10.1385/ABAB:91-93:1-9:459 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.198 · DOI
  48. 10.15255/CABEQ.2014.2037 · DOI
  49. 10.15376/biores.9.3.5045-5065 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.btre.2015.12.003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moshtagh, B., Hawboldt, K., & Zhang, B.
Affiliations
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Corresponding author
Moshtagh, Bahareh
Venue
Environmental Technology
Published
2018-05-14
Volume
40
Issue
25
Pages
3371-3380
ISSN
  • 0959-3330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-487X
OpenAlex
W2802902581
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland
  • Petroleum Research Newfoundland & Labrador
  • Research & Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
biosurfactant production, Bacillus subtilis, brewery waste, waste valorization, carbon source, fermentation optimization, surface tension, emulsification index, critical micelle concentration, ammonium nitrate, biodegradable surfactants
MeSH terms
Bacillus subtilis, Carbon, Micelles, Surface Tension, Surface-Active Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review