The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Remediation of Soils Polluted by Heavy Metals using Salts of Organic Acids and Chelating Agents
Abstract
Various weak organic acids and/or their salts were tested for the remediation of a loam and a sandy clay loam naturally polluted by heavy metals for over three years against two strong synthetic chelating agents (EDTA and DTPA). Among 7 weak organic acids and/or their salts, citrate, tartarate and oxalate were found to effectively remove Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn from the two soils in double extractions, at a wide range of pH. Citrate removed 80 to 99.9% of all four metals within 24 h at pH from 2.3 to 7.5. Tartarate removed 84 to 99.9% of all metals from both soils within 24 h at pH from 2.1 to 6.7. Oxalate alone is not effective in removing metals particularly Pb but with ammonium citrate (1:1 ratio) removed effectively 82, 70, 99.9, and 99.9% for Cd, Pb, Cu and Zn, respectively at pH from 2.6 to 5.8. Zinc met the Quebec A level soil clean-up criteria after two extractions whereas Cu and Pb reached the B level. Probably, two more extractions with these weak organic acids and/or their salts are required to meet the A level for the soil clean-up criteria for Cd, Cu and Pb. EDTA and DTPA removed 75 to 99.9% of the heavy metals within 24 h at pH from 3.5 to 9.0 for both soils. Citrate and tartarate were found to remove heavy metals from two contaminated soils, as effectively as EDTA and DTPA. But compared to EDTA and DTPA they removed 80% less macronutrients from the soil and improve its structure. Weak organic acids and/or their salts therefore can be used as an environmentally friendly remediation technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
F UNCTION AND M ECHANISM OF O RGANIC A NION E XUDATION FROM P LANT R OOTS
Ryan, P., Delhaize, E., & Jones, D. (2001) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.527 · Cited by 1,442
Evangelou, M. W. H., Ebel, M., & Schaeffer, A. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.062 · Cited by 632
Wu, L. H., Luo, Y. M., Xing, X. R., & Christie, P. (2004) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.002 · Cited by 373
Wu, W., Huang, H., Ling, Z., Yu, Z., Jiang, Y., Liu, P., & Li, X. (2016) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-015-1583-9 · Cited by 72
Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals from the Biosphere Perspective and Solutions
Mohan, I., Goria, K., Dhar, S., Kothari, R., Bhau, B. S., & Pathania, D. (2021) · Pollutants and Water Management · doi:10.1002/9781119693635.ch5 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Wasay, S. A., Barrington, S. F., & Tokunaga, S.
- Venue
- Environmental Technology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 369-379
- ISSN
- 0959-3330 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-487X
- OpenAlex
- W1983530591
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remediation of Soils Polluted by Heavy Metals using Salts of Organic Acids and Chelating Agents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09593331908616692
- The paper
- Wasay, S. A., Barrington, S. F., & Tokunaga, S. (1998). Remediation of Soils Polluted by Heavy Metals using Salts of Organic Acids and Chelating Agents. Environmental Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593331908616692
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.