The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Valuation of wildlife resources
Abstract
Helliwell D. R. (1969) Valuation of wildlife resources, Reg. Studies 3, 1–7. The recognizable benefits afforded by wildlife are listed as production, potential production, education, and recreation. These are further divided into a total of seven categories for the purpose of evaluation. Conventional cost-benefit analysis is regarded as being too tedious and difficult a process to be widely and frequently used. An attempt is made, therefore, to give a system for comparing one wildlife resource with another; the whole system being correlated to monetary values at a later stage. The principal parameters of assessment are the scarcity of the resource, its accessibility, and the diversity of species within it. Each of the seven categories of benefit is dealt with separately, to give a total for the resource as a whole. Possible applications of the method are cited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., & Boumans, R. M. J. (2002) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7 · Cited by 4,809
Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R. S., & van Ierland, E. C. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005 · Cited by 1,291
Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services
Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Ruiz-Pérez, M. (2011) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1177/0309133311421708 · Cited by 666
Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: A review
Margules, C., & Usher, M. B. (1981) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(81)90073-2 · Cited by 498
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
(1960) · Nature · doi:10.1038/188716b0 · Cited by 431
Metadata
- Authors
- Helliwell, D. R.
- Venue
- Regional Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1969-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-47
- ISSN
- 0034-3404 (ISSN-L)
- 1360-0591
- OpenAlex
- W2083802148
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Valuation of wildlife resources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/09595236900185051
- The paper
- Helliwell, D. R. (1969). Valuation of wildlife resources. Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595236900185051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
